← Back to team overview

openerp-community team mailing list archive

Re: Multiple alternates parts

 

Thanks Eric. I will try and have a look at it today.
On 2013-10-11 4:11 AM, "Eric Caudal" <eric.caudal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  it is in: ~openerp-community/openobject-addons/elico-7.0/
> (mrp_wave)
>
> Eric Caudal*CEO*
> --*Elico Corporation, Shanghai branchOpenERP Premium Certified Training Partner *
> Cell: + 86 186 2136 1670
> Office: + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37
> Skype: elico.corperic.caudal@elico-corp.comhttp://www.elico-corp.com
>
> [image: Elico Corp]
> On 11/10/2013 09:38, David wrote:
>
> Is it located on launchpad?
> On 2013-10-10 9:14 PM, "Eric Caudal" <eric.caudal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>> We have developed a module MRP that allows to automatically validate a
>> incoming move for MO with the available quantity of product of raw
>> materials and split the remaining quantity of finished product into a
>> separate move/MO.
>> This module is in p rioduction and worsk fine.
>>
>> It could be a base for development (instead of splitting you look up into
>> a substitution table etc.).
>>
>>  Eric Caudal*CEO*
>> --*Elico Corporation, Shanghai branchOpenERP Premium Certified Training Partner *
>> Cell: + 86 186 2136 1670
>> Office: + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37
>> Skype: elico.corperic.caudal@elico-corp.comhttp://www.elico-corp.com
>>
>> [image: Elico Corp]
>> On 11/10/2013 07:26, Dale Scott wrote:
>>
>> I'm in the same industry and need the same solution, but take a slightly different perspective.  I would call r15k5p our own part number, and manage a 1:many relationship to a manufacturer part number specified by the designer (e.g. a Panasonic part number), and another 1:many relationship to a vendor part number for purchasing (e.g. Digi-key's part number for the Panasonic part).
>>
>> This is standard practise in electronics product manufacturing, but everyone else seems to only care about the purchased part number. I would much rather use or adapt an existing module, but if one isn't available I would be very interested in helping to develop one.
>>
>> ---
>> Daledalescott.net - Transparency with Trust
>>
>> Oct 10, 2013 03:37:11 PM, trancen@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>>
>>        Wondering if someone has come up with this solution via a module already.
>>
>>          Company I work for is a manufacture of electronic products.  Our stock is comprised of hundreds of electronic components. Over the yrs some of them become obsolete but we still need to keep
>>
>>  the components as a stock-able item but we have newer components that are alternates that are linked back to the original component number.
>>
>> Some of the products we make here go back almost 20 yrs and those part-lists still reference the original part. To prevent us from having to update a old parts list(20 yrs old) we maintain those
>>
>>  older part numbers and our current system, that I'm working to replace, we can look up the replacement for it.
>>
>> The current system is just a mess, and I'm not putting that lightly, I wasn't the one who developed it :).
>>
>>
>>
>>  So we are now at a stage that we need to start almost from the beginning.
>>
>> We also deal with lots, in the sense that if a package of resistors is received by us today we, mark it with today's date as a lot number.
>>
>> r1k5p (original 20 yr old part number)
>>
>>  |___ Digi1k  (alt part)
>>
>>  |        |______ Lot 09012013  (10 pieces in inventory)
>>
>>  |___ Mouser1k (alt part)
>>
>>          |______ Lot 06162013  (6 pieces in inventory)
>>
>>  When I'm building the parts list. I want to refer to the original part "r1k5p", If I create a MO for say 15 units (and say part - r1k5p is used once). It would create a picklist (BOM)
>>
>>  that would show up something like this:
>>
>>  r1k5p                                            Total: 15
>>
>>  |______ Lot 06162013                           6
>>
>>  |______ Lot 09012013                           9
>>
>>  (I have attached a screen show of this layout in-case the formatting messes up.)
>>
>> I know what I'm asking is very likely not been developed already, but no harm in asking. Or if it's even possible doing with some(or A LOT) of coding in OpenErp.
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>

JPEG image

JPEG image


References