← Back to team overview

openstack-doc-core team mailing list archive

Re: Ironic docs & Service name standards

 

On 07/08/2015 02:41 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:


On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:aj@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 06/25/2015 04:10 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:

        For context: we are in this situation because of legal names,
        where some
        of the original governance allowed projects to use "OpenStack"
        in the
        docs as part of their name very early on. So, sometimes the phrasing
        needed "service" to help with readability. Also, legally we were
        required to use module due to branding with the OpenStack name.

        So, the convention is:

           * Uppercase first letter of first word only.
           * Do not use OpenStack in the name of the service.
           * Use module if it is consuming other services (such as heat).
           * Use service in general as that is mostly what is being added as
             projects.

        Now that we have the interop and brand guidelines, the use of
        OpenStack
        in a name in the docs is not needed, but we still need to be very
        careful and considerate in naming consistently.

        Bare metal fits our first naming rule.


    Anne, I saw your comment on:
    https://review.openstack.org/194230

    So, changing to "Block storage", "Object storage", "Bare metal"
    looks strange to me. But I'm neither a native speaker nor an editor.


Heh, my thinking is anything will look strange to us after editing Block
Storage for years.

Yep ;)

I really don't want to get into the explanations for Key-Value vs.
Key-value so I prefer the initial cap everywhere for simplicity. I'm of
course open to discussion. If this list really can't imagine these
guidelines working I can revisit.


    Looking forward to the patch - and perhaps a short list as overview
    to review.

    Btw. did you see the thread "[openstack-dev] Should project name be
    uppercase or lowercase?"


I think I replied on the review then on the thread, do you see it now?


Yes, you replied.

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126



References