-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 30/09/15 16:41, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Let me open a side discussion:
I also see far too many bug reports getting asked for.
We have been liberal about "obvious" bugs. So, a typo does not need a
bug report. A one-line addition of an OpenStack project that is part o
f
the big tent to a list of repos doesn't need one (a complete new chapt
er
needs IMHO something) etc.
Some people just create those but let's not complicate contribution an
d
if a patch is obvious, include it.
There's no sense to create a bug report "like X is missing in list Y"
and then confirm it, and fix it.
I absolutely agree with you here, and it's more or less what I was
trying to get to by saying we needed to trust everyone's judgement. If
you notice a typo, you don't need a bug, and if you have a bug, you
don't need it triaged before you fix it.
We need to allow people to have control over what they're doing, while
still maintaining good quality control. That's a tricky balance to
manage, and I don't have any brilliant ideas outside of 'keep talking to
people about this'. Happy to hear your collective wisdom :)
