papercuts-ninja team mailing list archive

Re: unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)

To: Ubuntu Quality <ubuntu-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ubuntu Papercuts Ninja <papercuts-ninja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Ward <teward@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ubuntu Bug Squad <ubuntu-bugsquad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:07:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <CACQJSg3twM2a9wY=LgBtqJ=dv3u_58K1-SPW+AXoPP=f3EFjmQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

On 18/06/14 18:00, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote:

I would say it’s because you have the font. Ubuntu doesn’t display
emojis out-of-the-box because it has no fonts supporting those
characters.


Shall we ask to include these by default?

Re: unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
From: José Antonio Rey, 2014-06-22

Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-16
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: C de-Avillez, 2014-06-16
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-18
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Robert Park, 2014-06-18
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-18
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Robert Park, 2014-06-18
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-18
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Thomas Ward, 2014-06-18
unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
From: Neal McBurnett, 2014-06-18
Re: unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
From: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos, 2014-06-18