papercuts-ninja team mailing list archive
-
papercuts-ninja team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01439
Re: unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
Maybe then we would fall into the situation where people who use other
OSs and don't have the Emoji font installed in their systems cannot see
them properly, or even the same stuff as with the Android/iOS example
that was given before.
On 06/22/2014 11:07 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> On 18/06/14 18:00, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote:
>> I would say it’s because you have the font. Ubuntu doesn’t display
>> emojis out-of-the-box because it has no fonts supporting those
>> characters.
>
> Shall we ask to include these by default?
>
>
>
--
José Antonio Rey
Follow ups
References
-
Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-16
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: C de-Avillez, 2014-06-16
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-18
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Robert Park, 2014-06-18
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-18
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Robert Park, 2014-06-18
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-18
-
Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real
From: Thomas Ward, 2014-06-18
-
unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
From: Neal McBurnett, 2014-06-18
-
Re: unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
From: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos, 2014-06-18
-
Re: unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-06-22