phatch-dev team mailing list archive

[Stani <spe.stani.be@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Nadia,

Thanks for your reaction. You are completely right about the relevance
sorting, in fact i came to the same idea. I filed a blueprint:

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/phatch/+spec/relevance-sorting

However I am still curious which tag layout you prefer. Is it Igors
with more overlap or is it the current system? We need to find some
agreement otherwise nothing can be implemented.

Best regards,

Stani

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Nadia Alramli<nadiana@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I prefer tags to categories or categories/tags. It makes searching easier.
> In Gimp or even Photoshop you have to go over large menus to find the filter
> you want. They are categorized but most of the time finding something you
> want is a pain. especially when the number of plugins grow. In phatch, on
> the other hand, it is much easier to search for what you want. Even if you
> don't know what it is called. Typing a keyword will most likely be enough to
> find it.
> The only thing that phatch actions menu is missing is relevance sorting.
> When you search, actions are sorted alphabetically. Say you are is searching
> for watermark. The first action that appears is Color to Alpha, Highlight,
> Mask and Text then you have to scroll to see Watermark. Many users may
> assume the action watermark doesn't exist. A better solution is to sort the
> results by relevance. A description match should score more than a tag
> match. And a name match should score more than both description and tag
> match.
> Best Regards,
> Nadia
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~phatch-dev
> Post to     : phatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~phatch-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>



-- 
Phatch Photo Batch Processor - http://photobatch.stani.be
SPE Python IDE - http://pythonide.stani.be