registry team mailing list archive

1. registry team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the registry mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file., (continued)
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: Jean-Louis Dupond, 2010-07-16
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: Michael Bienia, 2010-07-16
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-16
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-16
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: CarstenHey, 2010-07-16
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: CarstenHey, 2010-07-17
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-19
  • [Bug 543662] Re: Crashes due to wrong permissions of sudoers file.
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 11334]
  From: Reed Loden, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 11334]
  From: Kevin Brosnan, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 11334]
  From: Stransky, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 543662] Re: crashes and locks out root user
  From: Jean-Louis Dupond, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Tormod Volden, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: YannUbuntu, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Tormod Volden, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: YannUbuntu, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Tormod Volden, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: YannUbuntu, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Tormod Volden, 2010-08-15
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: YannUbuntu, 2010-08-24
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-13
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Fabio Pedretti, 2010-10-12
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Tormod Volden, 2010-10-17
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Fabio Pedretti, 2010-10-18
• [Bug 602267] Re: [RS482] pipes assert failure: pipes: ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:129: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted' failed.
  From: Fabio Pedretti, 2010-11-11
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: Pedro Villavicencio, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: Robert Roth, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: unnilenni, 2010-07-27
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: happyhamster, 2010-08-03
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: Saji.N, 2010-08-04
• [Bug 605597] Re: gcalctool crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse2()
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 604991] Re: Please merge tiger 1:3.2.3-3 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Lorenzo De Liso, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 604991] Re: Please merge tiger 1:3.2.3-3 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Stefano Rivera, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604991] Re: Please merge tiger 1:3.2.3-3 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Brian Murray, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604991] Re: Please merge tiger 1:3.2.3-3 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-17
• [Bug 604991] Re: Please merge tiger 1:3.2.3-3 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-10-11
• [Bug 604991] Re: Please merge tiger 1:3.2.3-3 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Artur Rona, 2010-11-12
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: cminyard, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: cminyard, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: cminyard, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: Lone Ranger, 2010-08-02
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: Marcos, 2010-09-01
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: HamilJF, 2010-11-13
• Re: [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: Steve Hammond, 2010-11-14
• [Bug 371720] Re: _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"
  From: Brian Murray, 2010-11-14
• [Bug 244480] Re: support AES-XTS mode
  From: David Santamaría Rogado, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 244480] Re: support AES-XTS mode
  From: Mårten Thornberg, 2010-09-04
• [Bug 244480] Re: support AES-XTS mode
  From: David Santamaría Rogado, 2010-09-05
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: ShawnPinet, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: lilphil, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: Agustín Fernández, 2010-08-21
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: cashy, 2010-08-25
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: cashy, 2010-08-25
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: gfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2010-11-09
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-11-15
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-11-15
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-11-15
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: balak, 2010-12-22
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: balak, 2010-12-22
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: cashy, 2011-01-03
• [Bug 479632] Re: VPN connection fails after one hour^H^H^H^H security-association idle-time expiry
  From: cashy, 2011-01-03
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: YannUbuntu, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: mogliii, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: LI Daobing, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: LI Daobing, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: LI Daobing, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-08-16
• [Bug 603111] Re: [ibus-anthy] typing "cya" does not give "ちゃ"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-08-16
• [Bug 395409] Re: file(1) doesn't recognize JFS file system
  From: Adam Buchbinder, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 395409] Re: file(1) doesn't recognize JFS file system
  From: Adam Buchbinder, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 395409] Re: file(1) doesn't recognize JFS file system
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-17
• [Bug 395409] Re: file(1) doesn't recognize JFS file system
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-08-05
• [Bug 605191] Re: package cpad-kernel-source 0.10-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2
  From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605191] Re: package cpad-kernel-source 0.10-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2
  From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 605191] Re: package cpad-kernel-source 0.10-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 61360] Re: magic string for "Bio-Rad .PIC" is too relaxed
  From: Adam Buchbinder, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 61360] Re: magic string for "Bio-Rad .PIC" is too relaxed
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 61360] Re: magic string for "Bio-Rad .PIC" is too relaxed
  From: Adam Buchbinder, 2010-07-27
• [Bug 61360] Re: magic string for "Bio-Rad .PIC" is too relaxed
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-08-06
• [Bug 390816] Re: external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 390816] Re: external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing
  From: Mark Edgington, 2010-08-22
• [Bug 390816] Re: external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing
  From: Martin Wildam, 2010-08-23
• [Bug 390816] Re: external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing
  From: Martin Wildam, 2010-08-23
• [Bug 491251] Re: [RV515] Switcher applet not displayed with OpenGL
  From: Tormod Volden, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 491251] Re: [RV515] Switcher applet not displayed with OpenGL
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-14
• [Bug 491251] Re: [RV515] Switcher applet not displayed with OpenGL
  From: CutControl, 2010-10-12
• [Bug 605436] Re: kpartx fails to map partitions (device-mapper: resume ioctl failed: Invalid argument)
  From: Malte S. Stretz, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605436] Re: kpartx fails to map partitions (device-mapper: resume ioctl failed: Invalid argument)
  From: Malte S. Stretz, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 605436] Re: kpartx fails to map partitions (device-mapper: resume ioctl failed: Invalid argument)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 605436] Re: kpartx fails to map partitions (device-mapper: resume ioctl failed: Invalid argument)
  From: Scott Moser, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 605436] Re: kpartx fails to map partitions (device-mapper: resume ioctl failed: Invalid argument)
  From: Serge Hallyn, 2010-12-14
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Brice Goglin, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Jeremy Foshee, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Walter Garcia-Fontes, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Walter Garcia-Fontes, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: John Steele Scott, 2010-08-05
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: John Steele Scott, 2010-08-05
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: gian, 2010-08-07
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: John Steele Scott, 2010-08-08
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: invitu, 2010-08-08
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Brice Goglin, 2010-08-08
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Walter Garcia-Fontes, 2010-08-08
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Anthony, 2010-08-09
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Morten Brekk, 2010-08-18
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Karol Szkudlarek, 2010-08-24
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: gian, 2010-08-30
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: gian, 2010-08-30
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Walter Garcia-Fontes, 2010-10-01
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Jon, 2010-10-07
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: go4linux, 2010-11-12
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: go4linux, 2010-11-12
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Odin Hørthe Omdal, 2010-11-14
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Odin Hørthe Omdal, 2010-11-14
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Henry Zeringue, 2010-11-29
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Brant Boehmann, 2010-12-02
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: John Steele Scott, 2010-12-02
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Brant Boehmann, 2010-12-03
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: cacula, 2010-12-05
• [Bug 605043] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
  From: Emmanuel Sifakis, 2010-12-10
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Brian Murray, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Philip Muškovac, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2010-08-09
• [Bug 601686] Re: tp-haze: contacts are removed upon deleting the group from contact list.
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Jerone Young, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Jerone Young, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Chris Coulson, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Mario Limonciello, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Jerone Young, 2010-07-18
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Evan Martin, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Jerone Young, 2010-07-19
• Re: [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Phill Whiteside, 2010-07-19
• Re: [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Chris Coulson, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 140918] Re: Adding stuff to autostart is too difficult
  From: Vish, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 140918] Re: Adding stuff to autostart is too difficult
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 140918] Re: Adding stuff to autostart is too difficult
  From: Owais Lone, 2010-10-01
• [Bug 604976] Re: Please merge tvtime 1.0.2-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Lorenzo De Liso, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 604976] Re: Please merge tvtime 1.0.2-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Lorenzo De Liso, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Stefano Rivera, 2010-07-18
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-30
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Ivan Borzenkov, 2010-09-03
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Stefano Rivera, 2010-09-03
• [Bug 605210] Re: Please merge ntfs-config 1.0.1-6 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-11-07
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Angel Abad, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Stefano Rivera, 2010-07-18
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-18
• [Bug 605311] Re: Please merge galternatives 0.13.5+nmu2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-18
• [Bug 604565] Re: Please merge motion 3.2.12-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Angel Abad, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 604565] Re: Please merge motion 3.2.12-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 604565] Re: Please merge motion 3.2.12-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  From: Angel Abad, 2010-10-27
• [Bug 313570] Re: tvtime does not rebember matte settings
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 313570] Re: tvtime does not rebember matte settings
  From: Psychotron, 2010-11-22
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-14
• Re: [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Scott Howard, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 605027] Re: Please merge with 0.9.7.14-1 from Debian unstable
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-22
• [Bug 276379] Re: Cannot handle OFX file with UTF-8 encoding
  From: Yasuaki Taniguchi, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 276379] Re: Cannot handle OFX file with UTF-8 encoding
  From: Yasuaki Taniguchi, 2010-07-18
• [Bug 276379] Re: Cannot handle OFX file with UTF-8 encoding
  From: Yasuaki Taniguchi, 2010-09-04
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Gursimran singh Mohar, 2010-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Jessica Leigh, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Gursimran singh Mohar, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: tob, 2010-09-09
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-13
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Dana Goyette, 2010-09-19
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Matteo Rossi, 2010-09-19
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Dana Goyette, 2010-09-19
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Davide Paltrinieri, 2010-10-05
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: RussianNeuroMancer, 2010-10-09
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Matt, 2010-10-09
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Matteo Rossi, 2010-10-10
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2
  From: Henrik Rydberg, 2010-10-17

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status