Em 08/12/2010 10:06, Christopher Swift christopher.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
escreveu:
>
> This is admittedly an advantage to Ubuntu in that it can run really
well and fast on machines that Windows has failed. However I have
concerns about driving this forward as a key feature or advantage to
Ubuntu. Ubuntu will become associated as a method of just fixing up old
computers and not one to use on new ones. Wouldn't this give us the same
image as say Windows 2000?
>
>
> It may be best to use this sort of marketing after Ubuntu has been
established main-stream on more modern computers.
>
> Cofion gorau,
>
> Christopher Swift
>
> --
>
> Sent from my Android
>
> On 7 Dec 2010 20:25, "alan c" aeclist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/12/10 18:59, Barry Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:40 +0000, alan c wrote:
> >>
> >> Th...
> Yes that certainly rings a bell. A dual booting friend of mine has a
neighbour with a very slow vista PC. After talking, she wanted to try a
ubuntu dual boot, and it has worked well, much faster. Now she still uses
Windows but not very much. She is a grandparent, and her family and
extended family also wanted to see it and want to try it too. At least in
principle, try it ..... Trouble is, family life is pretty full
and 'change' is necessarily time consuming. However, at least more people
know of ubuntu and that it works!
>
>
> --
>
> alan cocks
>
> Ubuntu user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-advert...
>
>