ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[HggdH <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 17:30 +0100, James Westby wrote:

> > What happens after one week of no response? Approval by fiat? Or should
> > bug-control administration act?
> 
> My idea assumed that they would get responses very quickly, so the week
> was just to make sure that there were no negative reviews that showed
> up after the approval had gone through, so we would have
> 
> Approval if there are two positive reviews, and no negative ones, and
> at least a week has passed since the application.
> 
> Do people think a week is a bit long here?
> 

I think a week is OK, given the dispersed nature of bug-control. But,
still, what is no responses in a week, positive or negative?

> > 
> > This is actually a good point. I suggest we propose that candidates
> > should be present in the #ubuntu-bugs -- this will hopefully allow for
> > interaction between candidates and others. This should help on receiving
> > reviews.
> 
> I'm all for encouraging people to this, but I don't think it should be
> a requirement for a bugcontrol application.

Sorry, I did not make myself clear. We must encourage bug-control
candidates to be present in #ubuntu-bugs, but we should not make it a
requirement.

One of the ideas of bug-control people is that they are theoretically
more up to speed on (do/do not)s for triaging, and should be available
to help. Of course, this is not a requirement, and should not be used
for/against membership.


..hggdh..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part