ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 05:30:52PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 10:56 -0500, HggdH wrote:
> > I would like to propose a slightly different approach: 
> > 
> > * any three can approve, but bug-control administrators have veto power.
> 
> My original thought was that two positive reviews and no negative reviews
> would be an approval. The same would apply for refusals based on negative
> reviews. If there were mixed reviews then there should be further discussion.
> In that case I think we would benefit from identifying who was going to make
> the call there, and I think the current administrators would fit well for
> that role. I'm happy for them to have veto power as well.
> 
> My hope for this was just to make it a very streamlined process for
> good applications.
> 
> > >  
> > > > > Additionally, the review process should be limited to a one week
> > > > > (calendar) period after the application has posted to the mailing list.
> > 
> > What happens after one week of no response? Approval by fiat? Or should
> > bug-control administration act?
> 
> My idea assumed that they would get responses very quickly, so the week
> was just to make sure that there were no negative reviews that showed
> up after the approval had gone through, so we would have
> 
> Approval if there are two positive reviews, and no negative ones, and
> at least a week has passed since the application.
> 
> Do people think a week is a bit long here?

I think it really depends on where we are in the release cycle and using
a week provides enough time during the busiest parts.
 
-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature