ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[C de-Avillez <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:04:35 -0600
Draycen DeCator <ddecator@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> hggdh,
> 
> Thanks for the response. Sorry about the URLs, I just noticed that on
> the wiki. I'm not sure how much information you want in regards to my
> process in deciding importance, so I've included just about
> everything you could need. Below is an explanation of how I decide
> the importance of bugs. (As a side note, I followed the wiki when I
> sent my application, so maybe add a step in there asking us to show
> examples of our procedures for deciding bug importance?)

<snip/>

> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/window-picker-applet/+bug/485352
> (Low) This report is requesting a trivial feature be added to the
> Windows List Applet, and the desired function is clearly stated.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/523236
> (Low) The bug is simply a cosmetic issue, which does not affect
> functionality in any way. Also, while the translation is not correct,
> users are still able to tell what it is supposed to mean.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/517777
> (Low) Once again, this bug is a cosmetic issue that does not affect
> functionality. In the event that the background does happen to be
> black and render the text unreadable, the user can simply close
> nautilus and reopen the folder in order to resolve the issue. There
> is also a simple workaround.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/515725
> (Low) Another cosmetic bug that only minimally affects functionality.
> The user is also able to easily reset the zoom so the display is
> correct again.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/516154
> (Medium) I originally viewed this bug as Low due to the easy
> workaround of simply not using the "Ask me every time" feature.
> However, after some discussing in #ubuntu-bugs, it was suggested to
> me that this could potentially be seen as a security issue since it
> involves cookies. As a result, we determined that Medium was a better
> fit for this report.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/514782
> (Medium) This bug affects the functionality of a core application, so
> a moderate amount of people are likely to be affected.
> 
> Hopefully this is a sufficient explanation of how I decide Importance.

Agree on all. The reasoning also helped.

<snip/>

> > So -- please -- give us your view of how *you* would set the
> > importance. After reviewing them -- and I would expect you get them
> > very much correct --, I will be extremely happy in giving you a +1.
> >
> > Right now, thou...
> >
> > +0. # should be 1...

Redaction:

+1.

..C..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature