ubuntu-gnome-dev team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-gnome-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00329
Re: Proposed changes for Ubuntu GNOME 17.04
On 19/12/16 19:42, Alfredo Hernández wrote:
1. Most computers these days won't even come with an optical unit, so
it makes sense.
2. Kill it with fire. As Tim mentions, I don't think any other distro
ships it at all, even.
3. Isn't it necessary for managing all your GPG keys? Or it just acts
as a frontend?
seahorse is the frontend, gnome-keyring is the backend afair.
1. Meaning we'll keep adwaita-icon-theme?
yes, but there will likely be ubuntu specific apps still using old icons
not in a-i-t, which could crash, but not a huge deal if we do it early.
1. I'd wait for the next LTS, as Tim says. The most recent
advancements for Music 3.24+ are transforming it into quite a
decent program. It would be a shame to remove Rhythmbox and ship a
half-baked music player, or to remove Music and then revert this
decision in a near future.
2. I'm sure 90% of our user base uses a web client or install their
own (e.g., Thunderbird). I think some components are still
necessary for GNOME Calendar to function, but the main app should go.
e-d-s is what provides the backend stuff for gnome-shell/gnome-calendar,
that won't be going anywhere at this stage. There has been past talk of
splitting out the calendar server not sure any work has ever been done
on that though.
Cheers,
Alfredo
On 19 December 2016 at 09:16, Tim <darkxst@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:darkxst@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Sorry I didnt see you previous emails.. Will comment below
On 17/12/16 12:42, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
I'm thinking about just making the changes 1-4 and 6 and see
what the
feedback is from Alpha 1. In that case, maybe we will do Alpha 1?
Thanks,
Jeremy
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Jeremy Bicha
<jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Tim and Rico, any comments on these proposals?
Jeremy
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Bicha
<jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Tim and Rico, what do you think of these changes to
our default install?
1. Drop Brasero but keep Nautilus plugin
https://bugs.debian.org/842830
I'm ok with this, burning CD's seems largely obsolete these days
2. Drop xdiagnose
It doesn't work in Wayland at least:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1616742
<https://launchpad.net/bugs/1616742>
And I don't think there's currently a way to hide it
from showing in Wayland:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/97478
<https://bugs.freedesktop.org/97478>
Are other distros still shipping this?
3. Drop seahorse
Mentioned in Michael's blog post [1]
It's a fairly technical app and has not really been
updated for the
GNOME3 style.
Seems ok, majority of users won't even know what keys are.
4. Drop gnome-icon-theme (and -symbolic)
The risk is that an app could crash if it depends on
the former
"stock" icons, such as ubiquity before Ubuntu 16.10
[2]. However, I
think GNOME distros other than Debian and its
derivatives already
don't install gnome-icon-theme by default. (Fedora
definitely does
not.)
I guarantee this will cause crashes in ubuntu specific components,
do it early or not at all.
5. Rhythmbox and the Music app
We currently ship both gnome-music and rhythmbox but
generally we
don't ship more than one of the same kind of app.
Rhythmbox still does
quite a bit more than GNOME Music and the Music app's
UI is rather
minimal (no obvious way to add music if it's not
stored in your
~/Music folder as of 3.22). I hardly listen to music
so I'd prefer
someone else deciding this issue.
According to Michaels blog installing no music player is the best
option. Music is very slick but not full featured. We did ship it
initially with the hope it would evolve to become default. but
that never happened. Rythmbox is also less than ideal. I'd be
almost tempted to leave this decision until the next LTS.
6. Drop Evolution?
I proposed this years ago [3] and it was kinda
controversial then so
we didn't do it. But Michael's blog post has
additional arguments.
[1]
https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/
<https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/>
[2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1614848
<https://launchpad.net/bugs/1614848>
[3]
https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/msg00265.html
<https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/msg00265.html>
I feel this is a good idea, but will there be a backlash? most
people may use webmail, but the once that don't will likely become
vocal
Ultimately it feels like we need a good central location to
provide recommendations of apps that aren't installed by default
but are core-ish/recommend GNOME apps.
Thanks,
Jeremy
References