ubuntu-gnome team mailing list archive

[Nathanel Titane <nathanel.titane@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gubuntu for me too. Relates well to the other spins as mentioned prior to
my saying it and I could possibly even say that with the welcome the
project has had, I doubt there could be any further confusion. Stating it
as 'Gubuntu' will only affirm, if not confirm the willingness of becoming
official and abiding by the Ubuntu standards to do so.


On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Maybe I should say it's past time for a name change ;^)
>
> Using "ubuntu GNOME remix" has resulted in the unfortunate use of UGR as
> an acronym which could be problematic due to this failed project:
>
> http://ugr.teampr0xy.net/
>
> I know becoming an official "flavor" of Ubuntu can be a long drawn out
> process but I remember using Lubuntu as far back as Lucid even though it
> didn't become an official flavor until Oneiric:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/ReleaseNotes/LucidLynx
>
> Why can't we do "Gubuntu"?
>
> Has anyone even asked?
>
> If we can't do that yet why can't we change to using using "ubuntu GNOME
> desktop" so the new acronym would be UGD?
>
> I really love this project because it will give us the opportunity to more
> closely interact with the Gnome devs and I'd hope our input can help shape
> the successful future of Gnome in general.
>
> Lance
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome
> Post to     : ubuntu-gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 

Nathanel Titane, B.D.I., Membre | ADIQ | Member
*
*
*TND*esigns | *G*raphic & *I*ndustrial *D*esign *S*olutions

514 . 583 . 7386