ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09573
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Landing team - RTM landings now officially open!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Bill Filler <bill.filler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 03:47 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
>> <lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> As we have now officially branched for ubuntu-rtm, we would also like to
>>> announce that landing for RTM-targetted images is now officially open!
>>> This means that all landers can have their changes landed into
>>> ubuntu-rtm when they want it. We have enabled some features in the CI
>>> Train for this purpose last week, but only now the test run is over and
>>> everything that lands will stay in the archive.
>>>
>>> By default from now on anything that's landed in ubuntu will not be part
>>> of the RTM-targeted images. So make sure you get the changes you want to
>>> ubuntu-rtm.
>>> Please read on to get to know the process itself.
>>>
>>>
>>> * How to land a package to ubuntu-rtm?
>>>
>>> First of all, you will need to have a separate branch for your RTM
>>> backports. The naming and location of this branch is all up to you. Some
>>> of the projects that participated in the testing landings last week used
>>> the naming scheme of lp:projectname/rtm-14.09 .
>>> Before releasing anything for ubuntu-rtm, make sure the same change is
>>> already released in Ubuntu current development series (e.g. utopic). We
>>> only accept cherry-picked changes from trunks. In other words: if
>>> something is to land in RTM it will require a double landing - one to
>>> ubuntu, then to ubuntu-rtm. Once that happens, fill in a landing with
>>> the new merge requests to the RTM branches in our CI Train spreadsheet
>>> and set the Target Distribution field to "ubuntu-rtm/14.09". The rest is
>>> the same as before, with the change being that the landing needs to be
>>> tested against ubuntu-rtm built images instead. Remember to double check
>>> that your RTM merges are targeting the right branches - i.e. the RTM
>>> branch created earlier.
>>>
>>> To summarize, the general process:
>>> - Making sure an RTM branch (for this example let's use
>>> lp:foo/rtm-14.09) exists and corresponds to what is in ubuntu-rtm
>>> - Creating a merge request of a feature/fix to ubuntu (target -> lp:foo)
>>> - Driving a landing through CI Train of this merge/merges to ubuntu
>>> (target distribution -> ubuntu/utopic)
>>> - Creating a branch with the same changes but based on lp:foo/rtm-14.09
>>> - Creating a merge request of the feature/fix to ubuntu-rtm (target ->
>>> lp:foo/rtm-14.09)
>>> - Driving a landing through CI Train of this merge/merges to ubuntu-rtm
>>> (target distribution -> ubuntu-rtm/14.09)
>>> - Change, after possible additional testing, lands in RTM
>>>
>>> Currently ubuntu-rtm landings are also treated very safely, so most
>>> landings might require a QA sign-off before those can be published into
>>> the archive.
>> For the landing that are RTM only anyway, I don't see why we'd need to
>> create a RTM branch. That would only make sense in case the upstream
>> wants to deliver new features that are not necessarily related to RTM
>> (so we can just cherry-pick stuff to RTM).
>>
>> Also, why can't we just do a package sync between both distros?
>> ubuntu-rtm is a derived distro anyway.
>>
>> It seems overly complicated, really.
> From the apps team perspective, everything we land in RTM we will want
> to land in ubuntu/utopic. I don't see any cases where this wouldn't be
> true. Seems most everyone will be in that same situation? Would be much
> simpler and faster to only have to do one landing into ubuntu/rtm14.09
> and have that automatically propagate into ubuntu. I'm concerned having
> to do 2 landings for each bug fix/change is really going to slow down
> our output.
You can pretty much can prep and do the landings for both distros in
parallel. Only the publish must be done in ubuntu before doing it in
ubuntu-rtm. Hope that helps for the time being.
/ubuntu landing silo gets normal testing; /ubuntu-rtm landing gets
more extensive attention with QA sign off for most things that are not
isolated bug fixes.
- Alexander
Follow ups
References