Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 12/01/2016 15:36, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
You can't just make some on-screen elements bigger for touchability and assume that there will be no tradeoff. Other elements will get smaller, and that has a cost. If someone has no touchscreen, or has one but doesn't want to use it, it's a cost with no benefit.
+1Of course the best thing would be a UI usable with touch and mouse with very little compromises, but that might not possible in many situations.
I think it's a mistake to make mouse interaction a second-class citizen (like Windows 8). I *very* rarely use the touchscreen of my laptop for instance (remember gorilla-arm effect?).
In the end the user should have the last word. GMail for instance has many different display density/mode settings, including a "touch enabled" one. I have it in the most compact mode (bad for touching) even though my laptop has a touchscreen.
- Daniel
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |