ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #21543
Re: Why UT is not ready
I might be wrong, and I often am but...
On 2016-07-09 04:49 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Samstag, den 09.07.2016, 13:17 +0200 schrieb
> linuxgehtned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> Think on it when you say it is ready for all. It is not really. It's
>> only
>> for developers or enthusiasts but really not for ALL. Will some of
>> this
>> points change this year? Or until the end of the second year on the
>> market
>> three months later?
>>
>> The marketing should really slow down its messages of readyness.
> can you point to a press release, announcement or mail where it has
> been claimed that it is ready for everyone ?
I haven't seen any press release that claims anything for anyone. I
think the issues is that we don't know who the devices are intended for.
Perhaps there are some documents that ship with the pre-loaded devices?
E.g. where to file bugs, why to file bugs, how to file bugs etc.
We might need to do a better job on the documentation and explanation of
where this project is at, where it's going, and what to expect when you
opt in.
>> I think
>> you need at least 50% more developers to not sleep against Android.
>> With
>> this not acceptable problems for a too long period then in some
>> months.
>> Please take a new developer to speed this biggest problems up.
> don't hold back, the code is out there, help fixing the issues you see,
> i am pretty sure nobody will turn down any patches if they fix problems
> ;)
This is true that Ubuntu is an opt-in, participatory project. Sometimes
that isn't correctly conveyed or received. We could put some more focus
on getting people to understand the nature and power of this type of
project, and the on-boarding system for those who want to get involved
(It's not just software).
I might just be terrible at web searching, but I could not find the code
for ubuntu touch. It may be a documentation problem. That being said, I
don't know how to code, so I would feel very left out if that was the
only way to contribute.
We can file bugs, and make suggestions, and influence the project in
other ways, but I think it can be frustrating for some people who don't
have the technical skills, and have their bugs overlooked or unattended.
Understandably, it is difficult to address everything, but we still
wonder what's going on behind the scenes.
>
> as you noticed, there is only so much manpower, but you can help to
> speed it up if you don't want to wait ...
Resources may be limited, but they can also be focused. e.g. "This
week's goal is to work on encryption. Everyone who is able, please put
efforts there."
There are essential items (i.e encryption) that could be focused on. We
could get those done one at a time based on some kind of priority. When
there is a wild fire in a village, some people don't continue to work on
doing the dishes. Everyone helps to take care of an urgent need.
Again, I don't know how duties are carried out, and perhaps it's a
documentation problem or an announcement issue.
tl;dr
I'm not a developer and I don't think like a developer, so I don't
understand what's going on from a developer point of view. I probably
need someone who is not a developer to explain some of these things. I
only understand things in terms of "features" that exist or do not, and
wonder why.
There is obviously a lot getting done. I use ubuntu phone as my one and
only mobile device in the wild, and I am thankful for what everyone has
done so far :)
I think a lot of the complaints are stemming from the huge gaping
question: what is currently being worked on and why? At this point, it
seems a communication problem. Trolls tend to lurk in the darkness. If
we can shed more light on the situation, then we might be happier.
>
> ciao
> oli
>
>
Follow ups
References