ubuntugnome-artwork team mailing list archive

[Tim <darkxst@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 31/08/15 16:31, Patrik Bubák wrote:
> While that may be true, problem here is that if presented wrong, it might give the user a bad impression. We want to avoid bad publicity, right?
True, I think it was OMG who made up a logo for us once (and it was horrid), when we first announced Ubuntu GNOME becoming official, because we
didn't have one at that point.
>
> These so called "news sites" don't have the proper resources atm. to spread the word, so they shoot out an ugly screenshot they made
> themselves and then people get the wrong first impression.
I was more coming at it from the legal side, GNOME or Canonical Boards, are not going to go after us because some news site leaked stuff that is
just a work in progress. However they will go after the news sites, if they feel the need.
>
> On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 16:27 +1000, Tim wrote:
>> On 31/08/15 16:09, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
>> > Again, OMG Ubuntu is 'not' the official source of information, at least for Ubuntu GNOME and have zero authority to speak on our behalf.
>> >
>> > Just want to make sure everyone here knows this fact ;)
>> to be honest I am suprised they didnt leak it earlier. But really what OMG and the other news sites do is not our problem, they are just after
>> clicks to sell out on advertisements!
>>
>
> -- 
> Sent using Evolution <https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/> from Ubuntu <http://ubuntu.com/desktop>
>
> Nothing ruins creativity like too many voices weighing in. We call it the /Ice Cream Principle/. Tell 10 people to go get ice cream with one
> condition: they all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour is going to be chocolate or vanilla every time. Groups of people don't agree on
> what's cool or interesting, they agree on what's easy to agree on.
>