unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01642
Re: Two suggested designs for the Sound Indicator
On Monday 03,May,2010 05:44 PM, Alex Lourie wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII)
> <sephiroth7vii@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:sephiroth7vii@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> I think it'd be better to keep the ordering static and alphabetical,
> in order to make it easier for users to establish muscle memory of
> how to use the menu.
>
>
> I don't agree. What if I have 10 applications that support sound
> settings? Will they all always appear in the list? That would be
> horrible user experience.
>
> Will only *running* applications be there? Then no muscle memory can be
> developed, as the list will be populated and re-sorted when new
> application runs; this will cause some applications change their
> location in the list.
I think some persistence can be built up by having applications always reappear
in the same location, similar to how application indicators are ordered.
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
References