unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01643
Re: Two suggested designs for the Sound Indicator
On 3 May 2010 11:44, Alex Lourie <djay.il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII)
> <sephiroth7vii@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I think it'd be better to keep the ordering static and alphabetical, in
>> order to make it easier for users to establish muscle memory of how to use
>> the menu.
>>
>
> I don't agree. What if I have 10 applications that support sound settings?
> Will they all always appear in the list? That would be horrible user
> experience.
>
> Will only *running* applications be there? Then no muscle memory can be
> developed, as the list will be populated and re-sorted when new application
> runs; this will cause some applications change their location in the list.
>
I think we should limit the list to applications that are registered
in PulseAudio or that have registered themselves with the Sound
Indicator. It would have no use to have non-running applications in
the Sound Indicator.
> Alex.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
> Post to : ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
--
Sense Hofstede
[ˈsɛn.sə ˈɦɔf.steː.də]
Follow ups
References