unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02188
Re: No "application bucket" needed
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 13:32, Mark Shuttleworth <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This would break Alt-TAB for me, completely.
>
> I trust Alt-TAB to have *all* the windows, just in last-used order. So
> things I haven't gone to are way back in the list.
>
+1
> I think closing the application window but allowing the app to continue
> to run, is appropriate (we have this for Pidgin and Empathy and Gwibber
> now, and it works).
>
Isn't the ordinary user's mental concept of closing the window via a red X
rather closely related with quitting?
Follow ups
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-16
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Siegel, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Luke Benstead, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Siegel, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Siegel, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Luke Benstead, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Siegel, 2010-05-17
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-17