unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02314
Re: No "application bucket" needed
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:59, Mark Shuttleworth <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmm... that's interesting :-).
>
> Simplistically, I would say that "if content is actively being shared,
> it should continue to run unless File->Quit is selected".
>
The extension of that issue is what happens to those services when you log
out. Is there a way to make that service persist beyond the current session?
automatically restart on reboot? Should a session resume if the machine
unexpectedly loses power, and comes back on 5 minutes later? Getting
progressively more off-topic, but I feel like I've opened a nasty can of
worms :) I do, however, think the connection between "services" and the
desktop experience is important to keep in mind, even beyond the session.
--
Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx =-
Follow ups
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19