unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02316
Re: No "application bucket" needed
On 19 May 2010 20:09, Jeremy Nickurak <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:59, Mark Shuttleworth <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm... that's interesting :-).
>> Simplistically, I would say that "if content is actively being shared,
>> it should continue to run unless File->Quit is selected".
>
> The extension of that issue is what happens to those services when you log
> out. Is there a way to make that service persist beyond the current session?
> automatically restart on reboot? Should a session resume if the machine
> unexpectedly loses power, and comes back on 5 minutes later? Getting
> progressively more off-topic, but I feel like I've opened a nasty can of
> worms :) I do, however, think the connection between "services" and the
> desktop experience is important to keep in mind, even beyond the session.
> --
> Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx =-
>
>
The problem here also is that some of these sharing services are
provided by plugins. What checks if plugins with sharing capabilities
are present? Is that already possible, or will we have to extend the
Rhythmbox Plugin API for that to happen?
Regards,
--
Sense Hofstede
[ˈsɛn.sə ˈɦɔf.steː.də]
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19