unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02315
Re: No "application bucket" needed
"If someone wants to keep the icon in the launcher, for things like
drag-to, they should be able to minimise it that way. So no, I think
both buttons should stay."
Think of music in the system tray as a fall back. If there's a
dedicated tray icon the controls and such appear there, and not in the
system tray. Food for thought.
-controls on hover over (500ms), click=whatever it was before.
As for Rhythmbox sharing files it seems that they are just files after
all and rather this shouldn't be handled by Rhythmbox. Unless
Rhythmbox is acting like a controller.
Follow ups
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19