unity-design team mailing list archive

[Ian Santopietro <isantop@xxxxxxxxx>]

I was pointing out that this configuration is not suitable for every 
user, the Inkscape users acting as a prime example. It is nearly 
impossible to find a default configuration that will work well for 
everybody, and the current default setup works best for a majority of 
users. I'm not opposed to making configuration more accessible, but 
changing the default to make a minority of users happy is not an 
acceptable solution for anyone.

I mentioned this because I felt these users had a valid complaint, and 
wanted to share a workaround for this complaint that they can do now. I 
apologize for trying to be helpful.

On 11/07/2011 09:23 AM, Josh Andler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Ian Santopietro<isantop@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > No. It comes down to meaning this group of users should set a different
> > unhide behavior than the default. You can it such that the launcher will
> > only unhide when you hit the corner, which is an acceptable solution for
> > this use case.
> No offense, but "this group"?... where is the "Unity" in that? As
> Thorsten brought up, settings are handled via different apps... where
> is the Unity in that? Shouldn't a more sensible default or more easily
> accessible configuration be the goal? You know, a more unified
> solution.
>
> Since you said what I should do, I'll tell you what you should do.
> Please shorten your rather excessive 11 line signature from your
> mobile device (or add "--" above your signature). You should do that
> as a courtesy to other people who are reading on mobile devices.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh


--
--
Ian Santopietro
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
"Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast Ofer middangeard monnum sended"
Pa gur yv y porthaur?
Public GPG key (RSA): http://keyserver. ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup? op=get&search=0x412F52DB1BBF1234