unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07605
Re: why compiz in place of mutter
-
To:
ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Chow Loong Jin <hyperair@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:08:19 +0800
-
In-reply-to:
<CAFYPf+uCaThdpUYa9hF2RPtYApTjFad_xOd0VmmhnYV=oBiSPg@mail.gmail.com>
-
Organization:
Ubuntu (http://www.ubuntu.com)
-
Sender:
Chow Loong Jin <hyperair@xxxxxxxxx>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
On 29/01/2012 23:53, supernova wrote:
> maybe it is because I have intel graphics, but I find gnomeshell
> faster then unity, at first and clean installation I mean. Let's hope
> better for the future...
I have two laptops, one of which runs on the Intel GMA 965/X3100, and another
running on Sandy Bridge graphics. I can safely say that under both of these
conditions, in no case is Mutter faster than Unity. It's probably an issue of
perception and bad press floating around, which can possibly stem from Compiz
being that much more customizable than Mutter.
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References