unity-design team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: adding a startup application is not average user friendly

To: Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad <joerlend.schinstad@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:08:00 +0100
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of joerlend.schinstad@xxxxxxxxx designates 10.152.113.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=joerlend.schinstad@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass header.i=joerlend.schinstad@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: unity-design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAOYNdEKuWGX8p-ev5pvkGTeJgWr5Pt24DBUFFegVsqd3J2guMg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120302 Thunderbird/11.0

Den 03. mars 2012 22:56, skrev Evan Huus:


    I think this tool is pretty broken right now, because it seems to have
    no idea who its audience is. Judging by recent changes, I am guessing
    it aims to be a non-technical tool. I think technical users would be
    better served with something else.

The tool itself is great. It just needs a different "add" dialog thatpresents applications instead of recently used files and folders.


--
Jo-Erlend Schinstad

Follow ups

Re: adding a startup application is not average user friendly
From: Thibaut Brandscheid, 2012-03-04

References

adding a startup application is not average user friendly
From: Thibaut Brandscheid, 2012-03-02
Re: adding a startup application is not average user friendly
From: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio, 2012-03-03
Re: adding a startup application is not average user friendly
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-03-03
Re: adding a startup application is not average user friendly
From: Dylan McCall, 2012-03-03
Re: adding a startup application is not average user friendly
From: Evan Huus, 2012-03-03