Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Václav Šmilauer a écrit :
Yes, it means they are considering a change. I guess our discussion gave a bit more weight to the "lets get rid of QPL" option, but I wouldn't push more than that at the moment.Reminds me a story about David and Goliath. :)When we hit 200 mails/day on yade-users like they have on cgal-discuss, we can start "pushing" them. :-PI know. But they confessed in that mail to us that they discuss it from time to time. I understood that they are quite open to that ("nous pensons de temps en temps" etc).
Yes. The only special case is if the company (or a university) wants to sell a software based on yade+cgal, or link with some non-open-source code. In that case they need to pay a commercial license.If a company uses yade and modifies it for its internal purposes (no selling, just research for their own), that should still be ok, right?
Bruno-
_______________ Chareyre Bruno Maître de Conférences Grenoble INP Laboratoire 3SR - bureau E145 BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France Tél : 33 4 56 52 86 21 Fax : 33 4 76 82 70 43 ________________
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |