yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05371
Re: Dem3DOFGeom : ScGeom
> > What is the reason for merging? I don't see any single benefit in that.
> Huh!? I really wasted my time then.
Let's not go personal. I did not ask for an apology of ScGeom. How does
this help in making Dem3DofGeom (or Yade in general, for that matter)
better? I don't see a single answer of that kind in you mail
unfortunately.
> > The fact of not distinguishing sphere+{sphere,facet,wall} cases makes me
> > think it cannot work properly, especially when it comes to plasticity
> > and so on.
> It can. A contact point is a point. It doesn't care if the bodies behind
> are cubes or spheres.
> Could you suggest an exemple of where this does not apply?
Suppose sphere and facet in contact, where the facet rotates along axis
parallel to the contact normal, so that the contact circumscribes a
circle around the facet's rotation center -- will that work?
> So, I revert and resume working with ScGeom as usual?
Yes, please -- unless you finally say what is the benefit of that
change.
v
Follow ups
References