yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Jan Stránský <honzik.stransky@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Anton,
Do you mean to replace boost::python::long_ by groupMask_t?
if BODY_GROUP_MASK_ARBITRARY_PRECISION is defined, both argument types (int
and bp::long_) are needed..
cheers
Jan


2014-06-06 13:07 GMT+02:00 Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>:

> 2014-06-06 10:47 GMT+02:00 Jan Stránský <honzik.stransky@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > I am soory, I am not sure what exactly is the point here :-) The
> duplicate
> > code in maskOk and maskCompatible? int argument is necessary as some
> other
> > classes uses ints (like NewtonIntegrator or
> > collider::avoidSelfInteractionMask), bp::long_ is optionally for
> body-body
> > evaluation. Probably I could template it.
>
> From my point of view we should have just one possible typedef for
> groupmask: int or boost,
> depending on the BODY_GROUP_MASK_ARBITRARY_PRECISION flag.
>
> Regards
>
> Anton
>