yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #14481
Re: Yade is not compatible with CGAL_4.13
Hello Janek,
thanks for the fix! I have checked it and it really resolves the problem
with the newer CGAL. I will reactivate CGAL-function for the
Debian-build again.
Regards
Anton
Am Mo., 7. Jan. 2019 um 13:44 Uhr schrieb Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx>:
>
> Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Sun, 6 Jan 2019 15:34:11 +0100)
>
> > > Hi Janek,
> > > I think that was the right fix, thanks.
> > > Note that yade is not using the periodic triangulation implemented in CGAL
> > > [1] so there is no question on that point afaik.
> > > Bruno
>
> good, great to know. During the migration I am not committing
> anything to gitlab. I also will wait until you synchronize my commits
> on github to gitlab :)
>
> > > [1] that's because yade included periodicity years before cgal. I actually
> > > implemented a periodicity based on cgal's non-periodic triangulation. Cgal
> > > devs made periodic regular triangulation available more recently -
> > > triggered by me for a part - but it's still not used in yade. Hopefully it
> > > will be used one day but the refactoring it implies is a bit daunting.
>
> Before we even think about doing this, let's first make sure that
> whatever we modify has working tests :)
>
> > I forgot to answer the test coverage question: no, move() is not covered by
> > any test, even indirectly.
> > The function is not used in other parts of the code currently.
>
> That is one of the test cases which I want to discuss in the
> compatibility thread :)
>
> --
> Janek Kozicki
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References