yade-users team mailing list archive

[chiara modenese <c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 25 June 2010 19:11, Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>> but what about simply using rotateAndGetShear, which is already available?
>> Splitting this function, as it is partially done, it is useful but in cases
>> in which some operations into the contact law are necessary (like damping).
>> You said that that function could be used to rotate any vector (in this case
>> the input would be a total shear displacement vector instead of shear force)
>> and it will return the increment shear displacement. No need to update code.
>> It would be only two lines code more (one line to call the function and save
>> the returned increment, the other to add the obained increment to the total
>> shear displ vector).
>>
>>
> Don't worry Chiara, what you have done will still be functional. What we
> discussed today was in relation with memory locality in parallel processing
> (right? :) ). After changes, the rotate function would be faster, the
> computation of relative velocity would not. Nothing more.
>
Ah ok I see, thanks bruno!
chiara

>
> Bruno
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>