dbusmenu-list team mailing list archive
-
dbusmenu-list team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00016
Re: LayoutUpdate vs ChildrenUpdated
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:13 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:21 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >> Naming signals using past tense of verbs looks better IMO and is more
> >> consistent with the other signals (ItemUpdated and ItemPropertyUpdated).
> >> I still believe the revision is useless, but I am willing to compromise,
> >> so what about adopting: "ChildrenUpdated(int revision, uint parentId)"
> >> or "LayoutUpdated(int revision, uint parentId)"?
> >
> > I'd prefer LayoutUpdated as it may include more than just the direct
> > descendants. For instance, GrandChildren could get updated as well :)
>
> Makes sense. Go for LayoutUpdated then.
Merge request:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/dbusmenu/layout-updated/+merge/17929
Thoughts?
--Ted
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Follow ups
References