dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:10:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:24:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>> Anders Logg wrote:
> >>>>> Are there any objections to making a new release (0.9.5)?
> >>>>>
> >>>> No, as long as you clean up the copious quantities of debugging output
> >>>> which is being printed to the screen ;).
> >>> I will.
> >>>
> >>>> Also, we should look at the DOLFIN Blueprints to see if anything else
> >>>> should be done before a release.
> >>> Sure.
> >>>
> >>>> If a release is made, I would like the next one to focus on the
> >>>> Blueprints. There are some very important but non-trivial targets, like
> >>>> more general parallel assembly, which should be addressed sooner rather
> >>>> than later.
> >>> Yes, 0.9.6 should be focused on bug fixes/blueprints. Parallel DG
> >>> assembly is important
> >> Not just DG - the symmetric application of boundary conditions is very
> >> important too.
> >>
> >>> but it's not at the top of my list of
> >>> priorities.
> >>>
> >> That's why we need to sometimes stick to the Blueprints - make sure that
> >> important tasks don't get neglected.
> >
> > Yes, but parallel DG assembly is not very important for me.
> >
>
> There is more than one Blueprint on the list.

I know. And as I said I agree that 0.9.6 should be focused on fixing
bugs/blueprints.

These two are currently at the top of my list of priorities but I
expect to work on other blueprints / bugs for 0.9.6:

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dolfin/+spec/solver-interfaces
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dolfin/+spec/add-intersection-functionality-for-nitsche

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature