dulwich-users team mailing list archive
-
dulwich-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00501
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 20:48 -0400, David Blewett wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I guess we should just make sure that those entry points that need to be
> > there are there and ignore the other ones. It's strange that limitinput
> > disappears though.
> I don't think it disappeared; I saw an error that some sort of max
> diff length had been exceeded (which stands to reason, as all the
> entry_points from Paster were getting pulled in).
>
> I relaxed the test, just making sure that the ones we expect are able
> to be loaded. Updated patch and pushed to my github fork.
Unfortunately, as discussed on IRC, this still fails.
It'd be nice if we can land this for 0.7.2. I'm also going to have a
look at HTTP smart server support for 0.7.2.
Cheers,
Jelmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Follow ups
References
-
[PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-19
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-19
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-20
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: Jelmer Vernooij, 2011-03-20
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-20
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-20
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-20
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-03-21
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: Jelmer Vernooij, 2011-03-25
-
Re: [PATCH] Unified gzip/paster patch
From: David Blewett, 2011-04-04