elementary-dev-community team mailing list archive
-
elementary-dev-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00281
Re: Contracts
Cassidy, I have some work started on this at
lp:~markellmtthw/+junk/web-contracts
There is some work that needs to be done getting a build system setup
(it's source only currently) and getting launchpad's packing service
configured for it. I am not very good at this part of the process, so
if anyone would like to import this code into Cassidy's project and
then setup building, packaging, etc, then I would be more then happy to
continue working on the code. Currently, I have Imgur, Pastebin and
Videobin contracts and uploaders in that branch with more planned.
Matthew Markell
On Fri 17 Feb 2012 05:19:58 PM CST, Cassidy James wrote:
> I've registered a standalone project on Launchpad to keep the
> development of web service contracts all together (though they could
> still easily be installable in separate packages):
> https://launchpad.net/contractor-web-services
>
> I'm not a dev and won't be working on the actual contracts, so I'd
> like to pass off the actual task of maintaining the project. Any
> takers? :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Cassidy James <c@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:c@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Yeah I agree, it should not be built into contractor.
>
> As Christian said, I don't see a problem with having a
> contractor-web-services package or whatever. Or if you'd like,
> have contractor-facebook, contractor-twitter, contractor-imgur,
> contractor-youtube, etc. packages, then have a metapackage of
> contractor-web-services. :) However we want to package it.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Christian Dywan
> <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17.02.2012 18:38, Daniel Fore wrote:
> > Gwibber may not be an option, but what about Polly? For
> things like
> Facebook, G+, or U1 I think they should be their own separate
> packages
> not forced in.
> >
> > As for configuring online accounts, there is already such a
> thing ;)
> I'm not sure how flexible GNOME Online Accounts is, but that's
> something
> to look into for sure.
> >
> > I really want to avoid a situation though where we have a
> bunch of crap
> installed that you have to go around turning off just to get a
> clean
> desktop.
> Turning off as opposed to what... uninstalling? Surely you
> don't expect
> users to manually select packages for individual services they
> need. Not
> to mention, this doesn't work in the uni/ library/ office.
>
> I think packages are only relevant as far as non-standard
> dependencies
> go. So long as GNOME Online Accounts decides *what* should
> show up and
> most services don't need special API, I see no problem having
> one "web
> services" package.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPPtrPAAoJEM375q7xpO2DDOcP/Re6+qZGOjvb5y9RE1sSQQHO
> XW/aWwSVR3y9uiGqBnbW4pZlJezzrU8jOUcWHqDrkQGf+PiQHtGxdSSj96FdnYUX
> 8IrbEbK4wzA0ZqHIY9543LzHU3dD45+C6mLHfJwa12rSugzTa1oLMk5+A3inyJhb
> 2vouOIJsxkWib0uN6M9jFDZhLZ+DkEdQoZnkV6fB9Dtv/3UOOdDo0DOLiRM5PsHv
> aNKxtvAvrQl5tS3bH0+W0m5ij0tTK7Udw2Eo0j7cRGFCtZ7pB7w9GURSuf7F7Lhy
> AbrFJmSDR3zMDjLBGuEPfpQVwvoIisZk5bgzOzluy2G8YWt8SHMsi+qQolqOESdB
> T+IhE5ljdjhvVrqxFYhXL6feP+QgZshiR+sz6kdyZPQGVNLkYG/Eb5jlwWDHlUwJ
> M9S/PPqzfadUKBnB1fw53bYFRA2nUHzV4Tk3g/lmb6CaSc56D40I8eQ7c2qzKu2s
> eOh+wXk04qfItKcL2oOlVbuKUSyrSlXLeN+agkdPYAtr9OQPKFwZSEgMYxRKDQkA
> RNog8vEArXiyJFk7eYAhmxQ+zPGqAYzhjQYWrOJzNQO/eEMV6q7DGDUvKE5xe1jS
> zSL3XDOvR9dNP2ySNOJenEDR6FZ6bDJ3w48gkbBRQZHokU9D8uIo9DNaoT0BC7Kc
> YAVpgYpwwDpD6zx6DCfw
> =yrXT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
Follow ups
References