fenics team mailing list archive
-
fenics team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01913
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
>> Why not support both (as PETSc does)? A top level CMakeLists.txt
>> descends in both the ffc subdirectory (calling distutils as e.g.
>> described in this blog post:
>> http://bloerg.net/2012/11/10/cmake-and-distutils.html) and ufc
>> subdirectory.
> This could be done, but we need the CMake for the the UFC extention
> module configuration, which generates a Python module. Your example
> above does not cover that case. As I understand it it is rather the
> other way around: distutils need to call CMake.
Could the extension module utility be moved to DOLFIN? Or does it not
fit in there?
--
Anders
Follow ups
References
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2013-02-25
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Anders Logg, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Garth N. Wells, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Anders Logg, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Garth N. Wells, 2013-02-27
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Johan Hake, 2013-02-27
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Anders Logg, 2013-02-27
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Florian Rathgeber, 2013-03-05
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Johan Hake, 2013-03-06