fenics team mailing list archive

[Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>]

No, it is used by ffc.

Martin


On 6 March 2013 08:35, Johan Hake <hake.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/06/2013 08:31 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> >
> >>> Why not support both (as PETSc does)? A top level CMakeLists.txt
> >>> descends in both the ffc subdirectory (calling distutils as e.g.
> >>> described in this blog post:
> >>> http://bloerg.net/2012/11/10/cmake-and-distutils.html) and ufc
> >>> subdirectory.
> >> This could be done, but we need the CMake for the the UFC extention
> >> module configuration, which generates a Python module. Your example
> >> above does not cover that case. As I understand it it is rather the
> >> other way around: distutils need to call CMake.
> >
> > Could the extension module utility be moved to DOLFIN? Or does it not
> > fit in there?
>
> I do not think it fits in there. It is pure ufc stuff. Anyone who
> creates a ufc class can wrap it to Python using the ufc extension module
> stuff.
>
> Johan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>