fuel-dev team mailing list archive

[Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Folks,
I'm wondering on the status of this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1261966, which basically affects our
rados-gw support story.
Looks like it has pretty decent comments and it is still Incomplete for
some reason. Let's review it again - what would be our action items in
getting rados-gw for glance?

Thanks,


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andrew Woodward <xarses@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:57 AM, David Easter <deaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>
>> If we install Swift by default for customer object storage, and it's not
>> very common for customers to choose ceph rados-gw, perhaps we can continue
>> to leave that out of the Wizard for now and keep it in Settings.
>>
>
> We only left swift installing for object because rados-gw support barely
> made it into 3.2, If https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1261966 is
> resolved, we probably should make rados-gw default if ceph is chosen for
> glance
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen