fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00699
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
Andrew
Could you give as a heads up on the status of this blueprint?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Thank you, Andrew.
>
> BTW, we do already have tests running for each change request in
> single-HA-Ubuntu-GRE installation: look into
> fuelweb_test/tests/test_pullrequest.py. Here you will find that we are
> running tests by using separate provisioning/deployment feature of Nailgun
> due to Nailgun restrictions on number of controllers in HA.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Andrew Woodward <xarses@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I created a simple blueprint
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
>>
>> First we will enable single controller in ha and migrate the tests over.
>> After we are happy with this, we can follow up and remove multi-node.
>>
>> Reviews will be up soon.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> Guys
>>>
>>> I do support disabling of simple mode but we need to review the code
>>> carefully. Andrew, would you please create corresponding change request to
>>> FUEL gerrit?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Mike Scherbakov <
>>> mscherbakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like majority +1ed. Let's go for it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Serg Melikyan <smelikyan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for supporting only HA mode in Fuel.
>>>>>
>>>>> During Murano & Fuel integration we experienced whole bunch of bugs
>>>>> introduced with deployment differences between this two modes, so I am
>>>>> completely agree with Dmitry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:02 AM, David Easter <deaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As long as you can do a 1-controller installation, it would be good
>>>>>> for both customers and dev to have the required step to pick HA vs. non-HA
>>>>>> removed. It also removes the chance that someone picks the wrong one in
>>>>>> the wizard (since we'd remove it from the wizard completely).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - David J. Easter
>>>>>> Product Line Manager
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Date: Monday, March 10, 2014 at 6:31 AM
>>>>>> To: Vladimir Kuklin <vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: "fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Fuel-dev] [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers
>>>>>> proposal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > you will still need to do some node cross-orchestration
>>>>>> It contradicts to Andrew's experiments (start of the thread), where
>>>>>> he was able to add 2nd & 3rd controller. Anyway, we still don't miss
>>>>>> anything if we drop simple mode, right?
>>>>>> a) You can do 1-node controller install
>>>>>> b) You can do 3-node controller install
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I vote for removing simple mode, as the use case (scale down to 1
>>>>>> controller) can be covered with 1 controller choosing HA mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guys, handling simple mode in the same way as handling HA mode is
>>>>>>> possible, but after you add controllers, you will still need to do some
>>>>>>> node cross-orchestration, e.g. updating haproxy nodes or mysql configs.
>>>>>>> Thus it still faces the same problem - Granular deployment and Much More
>>>>>>> Advanced Orchestrator is needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko <
>>>>>>> dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Sergey Vasilenko
>>>>>>>> <svasilenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> > I do not sure, that it's a good idea.
>>>>>>>> > Usualy, most of anything new things, we developing and testing
>>>>>>>> under simple
>>>>>>>> > configuration. And after it scale to HA configurations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it is actually a very BAD idea to develop using a
>>>>>>>> configuration that is significantly different from production.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Every time you increase the time interval between introducing a bug
>>>>>>>> (i.e. developing) and finding a bug (i.e. testing), the cost of
>>>>>>>> fixing
>>>>>>>> the bug increases exponentially. You no longer remember what you've
>>>>>>>> changed, you piled other changes on top of incorrect code, you
>>>>>>>> impacted other engineers who encountered your bug and now have to
>>>>>>>> figure out that it wasn't their changes causing problems, and so on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Simple configuration gives us low time of deploy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Using HA configuration will make us finally pay some attention to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> time it takes to deploy HA and fix it. It's not a fundamental
>>>>>>>> problem,
>>>>>>>> we're actually doing something wrong here and we should figure it
>>>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > possibility of don't use
>>>>>>>> > buggy Galera, songle-node AMQP. Works with "simple"
>>>>>>>> > configuration we can don't distractions to HA ussues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These are not distractions, you will encounter all these issues
>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>> you can release. And it will be much easier to fix them immediately
>>>>>>>> after they are introduced, not 1 week before code freeze.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > One of most typical
>>>>>>>> > examples -- migration to the next openstack version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is even more important for Icehouse. If we encounter Icehouse
>>>>>>>> bugs
>>>>>>>> that break HA before Icehouse is released (5 weeks from now), we
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>> get them fixed upstream instead of having to carry our own patch
>>>>>>>> series after the release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dmitry Borodaenko
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>>>> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Yours Faithfully,
>>>>>>> Vladimir Kuklin,
>>>>>>> Senior Deployment Engineer,
>>>>>>> Mirantis, Inc.
>>>>>>> +7 (495) 640-49-04
>>>>>>> +7 (926) 702-39-68
>>>>>>> Skype kuklinvv
>>>>>>> 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
>>>>>>> Moscow, Russia,
>>>>>>> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
>>>>>>> www.mirantis.ru
>>>>>>> vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>>> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>>>>> #mihgen
>>>>>> -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to :
>>>>>> fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe :
>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help :
>>>>>> https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc.
>>>>> http://mirantis.com | smelikyan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> +7 (495) 640-4904, 0261
>>>>> +7 (903) 156-0836
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>>> #mihgen
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yours Faithfully,
>>> Vladimir Kuklin,
>>> Senior Deployment Engineer,
>>> Mirantis, Inc.
>>> +7 (495) 640-49-04
>>> +7 (926) 702-39-68
>>> Skype kuklinvv
>>> 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
>>> Moscow, Russia,
>>> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
>>> www.mirantis.ru
>>> vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If google has done it, Google did it right!
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Yours Faithfully,
> Vladimir Kuklin,
> Senior Deployment Engineer,
> Mirantis, Inc.
> +7 (495) 640-49-04
> +7 (926) 702-39-68
> Skype kuklinvv
> 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
> Moscow, Russia,
> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
> www.mirantis.ru
> vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
--
Yours Faithfully,
Vladimir Kuklin,
Fuel Library Tech Lead,
Mirantis, Inc.
+7 (495) 640-49-04
+7 (926) 702-39-68
Skype kuklinvv
45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
Moscow, Russia,
www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
www.mirantis.ru
vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Follow ups
References
-
[fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Andrew Woodward, 2014-03-07
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Dmitry Ilyin, 2014-03-07
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Sergey Vasilenko, 2014-03-07
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Dmitry Borodaenko, 2014-03-07
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Vladimir Kuklin, 2014-03-09
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Mike Scherbakov, 2014-03-10
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: David Easter, 2014-03-10
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Serg Melikyan, 2014-03-11
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Mike Scherbakov, 2014-03-11
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Vladimir Kuklin, 2014-03-11
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Andrew Woodward, 2014-03-11
-
Re: [fuel-dev] single node HA controllers proposal
From: Vladimir Kuklin, 2014-03-11