fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01584
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
It's all Ok with IPs allocation. When user adds nodes to the environment
Fuel allocates IPs on these nodes including Public IPs automatically.
Function that allocates IPs just changed slightly to skip allocation of
Public IPs in particular cases but the entire workflow remains the same.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Meg McRoberts <mmcroberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I think I have this document correct now -- I tried some fancier
> formatting but ran into some formatting problems
> with our tools.
>
> We also need to recheck
> http://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/master/operations.html#adding-redeploying-and-replacing-nodes
> in conjunction with this. When I use Fuel to add, say, Controller nodes
> to the environment, does Fuel allocate additional Public
> IP addresses for the new nodes or do I need to do that as part of adding
> the nodes?
>
> meg
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin <akasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Agree, it should be clear as much as possible.
>>
>> I can imagine three-column two-string table with columns: environment,
>> Public IPs in HA mode, Public IPs in non-HA mode or
>> two-column four-string one with columns: environment, Public IPs (HA,
>> non-HA is separate strings).
>>
>> About terminology: let's name nodes by roles names we use to not confuse
>> someone: cinder, ceph, mongo.
>>
>>
>>
>> Aleksey Kasatkin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Meg McRoberts <mmcroberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> About the example... I'm thinking that I should go back to the old
>>> definition of the environment here,
>>> then maybe present the information about the requisite number of IPs in
>>> a table.
>>>
>>> And I need to figure out a way that isn't totally cumbersome to reflect
>>> that one set of numbers is for
>>> all 5.0.x environments, 5.1 Nova-network environments, and 5.1 Neutron
>>> environments that specify
>>> "Assign public network to all nodes".
>>>
>>> BTW, a terminology question: for a discussion like this, do you consider
>>> Zabbix nodes to be separate
>>> from Compute and Storage nodes? What about MongoDB nodes? Someone said
>>> that a MongoDB node
>>> is really a storage node. I'm not sure...
>>> meg
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Meg McRoberts <mmcroberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks so much for clearing that up, Aleksey -- I did not understand
>>>> that.
>>>> I just modified the source -- I need to rework the example (which need
>>>> to
>>>> be examples now) but I marked it as Neutron (default behavior) for now.
>>>>
>>>> meg
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin <
>>>> akasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please note that Public network is always allocated to all nodes in
>>>>> case of Nova-Network:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-web/blob/master/nailgun/nailgun/objects/node.py#L152-154
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes affect Neutron-enabled deployments only.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aleksey Kasatkin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko <
>>>>> dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Good point, we need to update this. Note that the special case is just
>>>>>> for compute nodes with nova-network (HA vs non-HA is not relevant
>>>>>> since it only impacts configuration of controllers, and they always
>>>>>> are allocated public IP addresses).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Meg McRoberts <
>>>>>> mmcroberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> > It looks like we need to update the documentation about Public and
>>>>>> Floating
>>>>>> > IPs:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> http://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/master/reference-architecture.html#public-and-floating-ip-address-requirements
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I think I should change, "Each deployed node requires one IP
>>>>>> address from
>>>>>> > the Public network"
>>>>>> > to "Each controller and Zabbix node..." -- this applies to both
>>>>>> Nova and
>>>>>> > Neutron.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I will also need to rework the example.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > What about the single-node HA-ready deployment? Does that still
>>>>>> need the
>>>>>> > extra IP address?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > meg
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko
>>>>>> > <dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> For the reference, this was fixed under this bug:
>>>>>> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1272349
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Here's a fuel-docs review updating the release notes for 5.1, I've
>>>>>> >> added a note about this there:
>>>>>> >> https://review.openstack.org/117672
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin
>>>>>> >> <akasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > Yes, 'public' is not assigned to all nodes in case of Neutron.
>>>>>> Though it
>>>>>> >> > can
>>>>>> >> > be assigned optionally. Documentation is to be fixed.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Aleksey Kasatkin
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Jesse Pretorius
>>>>>> >> > <jesse.pretorius@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> The release notes in master have this note under 'Other
>>>>>> limitations':
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Deployments done through the Fuel UI create all of the networks
>>>>>> on all
>>>>>> >> >> servers even if they are not required by a specific role. For
>>>>>> example,
>>>>>> >> >> a
>>>>>> >> >> Cinder node has VLANs created and addresses obtained from the
>>>>>> public
>>>>>> >> >> network.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> I don't think that this is true for 5.1 onwards - there was
>>>>>> some work
>>>>>> >> >> done
>>>>>> >> >> recently to change this behaviour... well, I think it's all
>>>>>> merged now?
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> --
>>>>>> >> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> >> >> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> >> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> >> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>> >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> >> > Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Dmitry Borodaenko
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> >> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>>>>> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dmitry Borodaenko
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
References
-
Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Jesse Pretorius, 2014-09-12
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Aleksey Kasatkin, 2014-09-12
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Dmitry Borodaenko, 2014-09-12
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Meg McRoberts, 2014-09-12
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Dmitry Borodaenko, 2014-09-12
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Aleksey Kasatkin, 2014-09-15
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Meg McRoberts, 2014-09-15
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Meg McRoberts, 2014-09-15
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Aleksey Kasatkin, 2014-09-15
-
Re: Documentation bug? Public addresses on all nodes
From: Meg McRoberts, 2014-09-15