geda-developers team mailing list archive

[Evan Foss <evanfoss@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:50:20PM -0400, Evan Foss wrote:
> ...
>> Odd how emotional a load of technical nonsense can get isn't it.
> Yes, it is. I've been too emotional, sorry.

It's ok. I think that part of this thread was not my finest moment ether.

> ...
>> > I remember I have said I'm fully agreed with Peter Brett. I don't think
>> > there is a reason to continue voting while other devs ignored it and
>> > Peter and me total overwhelming majority :) But what does it change?
>>
>> No. Your plan as stated was to take everyone active on the developers
>> list and put them to a vote. You even put me in as voting along with
>> Markus whom you were replying too and DJ. Plus you were just saying in
>> another thread that we should add a few other people including John
>> Doty to that list. My memory is failing me but I don't recall any of
>> them in opposition.
>>
>> I am just trying to clear this up because the project needs to know
>> what we are to do to clarify such conflicts while all the original
>> luminaries are away.
>
> I had been waiting for responses of members of this list. None of them,
> besides you and Peter, has answered directly the proposed questions, and
> even your answer was indeed a question. So, as I see it, that voting has
> not taken place.

Sorry yes I vote for the plan. I thought the vote was just for the
founding people/people who committed in the near recent past.

(For all DJ's talking about this being the list for people with commit
privileges because I don't think I have them to the gEDA repo.)

I guess DJ obtained because he is really more on the PCB side than gEDA.

> Please consider my previous answer (about "majority") a joke.
> I understand my position is overwhelmingly minor and I'm biased to agree
> with you wrt having xorn in the geda-gaf repository.

You have a bias but I was overboard about pointing it out. Sorry.

> Thank you Evan,

:)

> and thank you all developers for your input.

It is frustrating that they are all ignoring this. I guess we could
import the people we were talking about adding and then put it to
another vote but that feels electioneering or rigging the ballot box.

I think we should just adopt the plan and move forward.

> Please excuse me, perhaps I was rough in this discussion and my
> emotional replies appeared to be offensive or insulting to you.
> I'm very sorry about that.

It comes for us all.

> Thanks,
>   Vladimir
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers
> Post to     : geda-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/