holland-coredev team mailing list archive
-
holland-coredev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00004
[Bug 670192] [NEW] Specify engines to be treated as transactional
Public bug reported:
It would be useful to have a configuration option to specify which
engines are to be considered transactional when determining whether or
not to use --single-transaction in mysqldump providers. An example would
be a schema that has 5 InnoDB tables and one HEAP table being downgraded
to using --lock-tables.
** Affects: holland-backup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Specify engines to be treated as transactional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670192
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Holland
Developers, which is the registrant for holland-backup.
Status in Holland Backup Framework: New
Bug description:
It would be useful to have a configuration option to specify which engines are to be considered transactional when determining whether or not to use --single-transaction in mysqldump providers. An example would be a schema that has 5 InnoDB tables and one HEAP table being downgraded to using --lock-tables.
Follow ups
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-05-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-05-15
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: m00dawg, 2011-04-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-04-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: m00dawg, 2011-04-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: m00dawg, 2011-04-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-04-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: m00dawg, 2011-04-21
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: m00dawg, 2011-04-20
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-04-20
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-04-20
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2011-04-01
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: MikeG, 2011-03-30
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2010-12-17
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: m00dawg, 2010-12-12
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2010-12-12
-
[Bug 670192] Re: Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: Andrew Garner, 2010-11-06
-
[Bug 670192] [NEW] Specify engines to be treated as transactional
From: MikeG, 2010-11-03
References