kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11131
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:41:26AM -0600, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> a layer number is a copper layer or not. For things like holes, range
> comparisons are done mostly and bitmasks are useless. For non-copper
I do not agree on that. Everything that's related to a pad need to be
masked. Unless you add a list of layers, which is just another
(less efficient) representation for a bitmask. Or esplode the pad in
multiple instances to represent a padstack (that would be the cleanest
solution, given some backpointer to correlate them).
But of course that would be a massive modification.
--
Lorenzo Marcantonio
Logos Srl
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Follow ups
References
-
Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: jp charras, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03