kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11134
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
Lorenzo,
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
> I do not agree on that. Everything that's related to a pad need to be
> masked. Unless you add a list of layers, which is just another
> (less efficient) representation for a bitmask. Or esplode the pad in
> multiple instances to represent a padstack (that would be the cleanest
> solution, given some backpointer to correlate them).
>
> But of course that would be a massive modification.
You don't need list of layers: just from and to--a pair.
--brian
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock � The reasonable man adapts himself to the �
bidulock@xxxxxxxxxxx � world; the unreasonable one persists in �
http://www.openss7.org/ � trying to adapt the world to himself. �
� Therefore all progress depends on the �
� unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw �
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: jp charras, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-03