kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #35082
Re: CvPcb Save
But what’s the point of having ctrl-S at all if it just moves it to some other place in volatile memory? The user might as well just wait until they close CvPcb, as volatile is volatile, no?
> On 21 Mar 2018, at 12:47, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A possible short term fix is to change the action from save to update
> schematic which is what really happens and is more analogous to clicking
> the OK button in a modal dialog. I don't know if saving the schematic
> from CvPcb makes a lot of sense. I would keep the ctrl+s shortcut.
> Changing this will most like annoy users who are used to it.
>
> As for changing CvPcb to a dialog, keep in mind that there are a several
> child windows (footprint and 3d model views) that can be opened that
> would not fit into your typical dialog behavior. There is also support
> for handling footprint association files.
>
>
> On 3/20/2018 3:44 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
>> I think the cleanest user model would be to make both CvPcb and the
>> Symbol Table alternative views of the document. However, that either
>> suggests a tabbed presentation (where two views are not visible at
>> once), or hooking up CvPcb and the Symbol Table to reflect changes made
>> in the schema.
>>
>> Given that the normal use-case is more batch-oriented (the user has
>> other tools to do single associations or edit single symbol fields), I
>> don’t think it warrants that kind of investment.
>>
>> So that means we’re stuck with a more modal approach. (Note that while
>> CvPcb is the equivalent of modeless today, it doesn’t update in
>> real-time, and silently drops changes made to symbols which no longer
>> exist in the schema.)
>>
>> It sounds like we’re coalescing around having save be active in the
>> (modal) dialogs. How do we communicate that? Perhaps just a “Save”
>> button in the dialog is good enough — it both gives them the idea that
>> this is just a dialog to the parent application (so “obviously” Save
>> will save the parent schematic), and at least a clue that they can cmd-S
>> as well.
>>
>> If that’s the direction we want to move in, then I can just have CvPcb’s
>> Save write the schema to disk for 5.0. Re-presenting CvPcb as a dialog
>> is probably too large (ie: risky) for 5.0.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Mar 2018, at 18:00, Bernhard Stegmaier <stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On a second thought it is basically just another special “Symbol
>>> Table” edit dialog.
>>>
>>> The problem of losing a lot of unsaved work in case of a crash is also
>>> there for the “Symbol Table” dialog.
>>> I could hack in a lot of valuable data in custom fields and although
>>> this dialog has an “Apply” button, you can’t save there.
>>> I don’t know if some autosave would take care of it…
>>>
>>> So, however it is done wrt save/apply it should be the same for both
>>> “dialogs”.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bernhard
>>>
>>>> On 20. Mar 2018, at 18:55, Jon Evans <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah I also agree that it should be basically a dialog of eeschema
>>>> rather than a separate program, so I guess it makes sense to write
>>>> changes immediately to the in-memory schematic, and mark it as
>>>> unsaved for the user to consciously hit the save button later if desired.
>>>>
>>>> -Jon
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Russell Oliver
>>>> <roliver8143@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:roliver8143@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:roliver8143@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:roliver8143@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I second Bernhard's comments.
>>>> I think it shouldn't seem like a separate program, just another
>>>> dialog of eeschema that takes the what you see is what you get
>>>> approach.
>>>> As long as the footprint references are valid the schematic
>>>> should be updated when the dialog is closed, and marked modified
>>>> if there was a change.
>>>> Saving the schematic to file is then done through eeschema proper.
>>>>
>>>> Russell
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 04:40 Bernhard Stegmaier,
>>>> <stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stegmaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just my 2 cents…
>>>> I would immediately write back any change in cvpcb to schematic.
>>>> I never understood why I have to hit the button to do that.
>>>> There is no PCB preview or something like that in cvpcb, so I
>>>> have to apply all changes anyway to check them directly in
>>>> the PCB.
>>>> Then, keep the button and save schematic with it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bernhard
>>>>
>>>>> On 20. Mar 2018, at 18:28, Jon Evans <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you like the idea of saving the schematic when you
>>>>> hit the save button? That seems like a reasonable expected
>>>>> behavior to me at least.
>>>>>
>>>>> (I dislike nag dialogs especially when they seem to have no
>>>>> purpose)
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> CvPcb has a Save command (complete with disk icon).
>>>>> Only it doesn’t do that. (It simply writes the changes
>>>>> back to eeschema.)
>>>>>
>>>>> If it were a dialog, I’d say that’s not good. But this
>>>>> is CvPcb, where you could easily spend an hour making
>>>>> associations (hitting save every few minutes), only to
>>>>> have your machine and/or Kicad go down with all your
>>>>> changes. That’s borderline horrific.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t like the idea of blind-saving the eeschema
>>>>> document, but I think that would be better than what we
>>>>> have now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another idea would be to trigger an auto-save for each
>>>>> CvPcb save. It’s not ideal because the user may think
>>>>> that there aren’t any changes in their eeschema file and
>>>>> therefore ignore the auto-save warning when restarting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another idea would be to foist the decision on the
>>>>> user with a “Save your schematic?” dialog every time you
>>>>> save in CvPcb. That’s pretty hard to love, but with
>>>>> Orson’s new KIDIALOG we could at least have a “don’t ask
>>>>> me again” checkbox. Maybe that’s not so bad….
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>>
>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>>
>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>>
>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>>
>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>>
>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>>
>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References