kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #35843
Re: More default fields in schematic
I second Kristoffer. Some made with kicad examples are mine, some use #mfg
and some use MPN because there is no common way to address a basic thing
like a part number and for me it changed over the years, rendering old
projects hard to maintain. Now I'leaning towards MPN only because kicost
didn't support (or I coudnlt figure out) a #mfg field.
Those who want a different field name can add a new field and use it, but
IMO kicad needs some common ground on this particular issue.
Marcos
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark <
kristofferodmark90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, that is one usage of it, some people likes to make the schematic their
> bom, some tools and services can also rely on such values.
>
> Once again, the only people complaining are the ones that do not use it,
> and also the ones that will not be affected. Sure name it PartNum and use
> it the way you describe, you would never use any other tools to interact
> anyway, since that apparently is not your job... I only want there to be a
> common denomination for the the field names by default.
>
> Because right now, anyone who actually uses the Schematic this way, which
> are quite many will always have to randomly define and abbreviate the same
> field, which just hinders anything smart to be done on top of it.
>
> To better go with your thinking, I suggest you remove all the keybindings
> i KiCad, and then set them to what you want. That way you will get the
> current field experience. Everything is better with no defaults, amiright?
>
> -Kristoffer
>
> On 2018-05-21 06:13, Jean-Paul Louis wrote:
>
>> That discussion once again shows how people misunderstand the concept of
>> part number.
>> In a schematic, the part number attached to a RefDes should be unique AND
>> NOT a manufacturer number.
>> There should be a one to one relationship between a part number
>> (symbol) and a physical shape, so the PCB will be a unit manufacturable
>> only when the BOM is generated, and is one to one relationship between part
>> number and Mfg part number.
>> The BOM is only for manufacturing assembly and procurement purpose
>> and does not need to be part of the design database, so Manufacturing can
>> use Equivalent Mfg numbers for a given part number. That’s why many
>> companies use internal numbering systems that are non picture coded and
>> just sequential.
>> The relationship Symbol, Shape, Supplier is the responsibility of the
>> master library, not the designers.
>>
>> Just my $0.02,
>> Jean-Paul
>> N1JPL
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 20, 2018, at 6:27 PM, Andrey Kuznetsov <kandrey89@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree, I had the same issue when I was doing my board, I needed a
>>> field for all components, and I had to manually add it for every item,
>>> there was no way to add this field to all components at the same time or to
>>> have it add by default from the addition of a new component to the sheet.
>>>
>>> Which reminds me, Cadence Designer has tools to manipulate fields on a
>>> large scale, whether to add, delete, show, hide, etc, this is something
>>> that would be nice to have in KiCAD, either that or a table of all
>>> components for the sheet or schematic and columns for each field, with
>>> ability to show/hide each cell individually.
>>>
>>> I think the ultimate goal is to make the Symbol Table more useful, but
>>> that'll take to long for v5 so if Kristoffer's patch allows an easy way to
>>> add fields to all components or similar, I'd say do it because people will
>>> be pissed and waste their time doing it for every component in their
>>> schematic.
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 3:01 PM, kristoffer Ödmark <
>>> kristofferodmark90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I obvviously disagree, the correct solution would be to have both. This
>>> does not hinder that, its not even the same problem.
>>>
>>> The problem is for everyone who want for example the Manufacturer Part
>>> Number will have to define a fieldname, which every time
>>> results in them abbreviating it to something different. Hence nobody can
>>> work with Manufacturer Part Numbers.
>>>
>>> Here is something similar, Imagine all of the colours in Kicad for all
>>> of the layers where white by default. Have fun defining all the colours
>>> yourself.
>>> Maybe you want to define them yourself, nobody is stopping you now
>>> either, just get cracking.
>>>
>>> How easy would it be for you to look at the board someone else made
>>> later and understand what is what? Maybe for some that is a better
>>> solution, but for me that
>>> would be an extreme example of bad default values.
>>>
>>> This is how the default fields are now, they are white, or more like
>>> see-throught, which makes life harder for anyone that
>>> wants to contribute or create tools that interact with kicad, and as I
>>> previously said, this is only a default, you are still
>>> equally able to add/remove or change the fields how you want to. But,
>>> tools like kibom or various other web-based tools can much
>>> easier integrate to it, or at least support a default value as well. So
>>> for the majority of users, who doesnt change defaults,
>>> the tool would just work.
>>>
>>> I will reiterate, I do not care what they are named, I want a default
>>> field where I can put my manufacturer part number, amongs others.
>>> The specific abbreviation or name does not matter, If i care, I can
>>> manually add/remove my own fields *JUST AS I DO NOW*, but for the people
>>> who use it, it will be easier across projects, for the people that dont,
>>> It will not matter.
>>>
>>> Sane defaults matter. A lot actually.
>>>
>>> - Kristoffer
>>>
>>> On 2018-05-20 23:40, José Ignacio wrote:
>>> I dont like this, the right solution would be to allow for importing a
>>> default config into kicad for things like that, as different groups will
>>> have different policies.
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark <
>>> kristofferodmark90@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:kristofferodmark90@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The patch should only affect first startup, changes to the fields
>>> will be saved
>>>
>>> On May 20, 2018 22:18, "Seth Hillbrand" <seth.hillbrand@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:seth.hillbrand@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kristoffer-
>>>
>>> This feels like a management issue rather than a tool issue.
>>> If the user doesn't want any extra fields, how would your
>>> patch allow that?
>>>
>>> -S
>>>
>>>
>>> Am So., 20. Mai 2018 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb kristoffer Ödmark
>>> <kristofferodmark90@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:kristofferodmark90@xxxxxxxxx>>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I will open this can of worms again, I feel that I have
>>> to. So from what
>>> I gather we have proffessionals as the main aim in Kicad.
>>> The reason I will open this issue again is that I feel we
>>> have a
>>> collaboration issue, maybe not a mayor one. But one
>>> nonetheless.
>>>
>>> We really need more default fields for our schematic
>>> symbols. Im not
>>> proposing required fields, I am *ONLY* proposing that
>>> there should be default fields added into the default
>>> fields settings
>>> tab. I am not proposing they need to be filled in the
>>> libraries, nor that people need to use them. only that
>>> they need to
>>> exist with a fresh install of kicad so that easy problems
>>> such as theese do not happen:
>>>
>>> - Collaborators working on the same project will not
>>> create
>>> duplicate fields in libs/projects describing the same
>>> thing by mistake
>>> - Projects that aim to interact or add to Kicad can
>>> assume that the
>>> Fields will exist, and will know what name/tag to look for
>>> (bom exporters, price checkers, MacroFab, etc)
>>> - Open source projects will be easier to collaborate,
>>> read and order
>>>
>>> The reason I think it is better to have the fields by
>>> default than the
>>> current solution to add them is that the majority will use
>>> what exists, and tools can support it from the very
>>> beginning, people
>>> with inhouse tools seems to dislike this, since they map
>>> their
>>> parts with an inhouse number - and then handle the
>>> information about the
>>> part there. From what I gather, this is not the majority,
>>> and
>>> these persons still modify the default fields settings.
>>>
>>> I spent maybe 30-40 mins checking the "made with kicad"
>>> projects, I
>>> found that the most common addition to libs and schematics
>>> are:
>>> - Manufacturers part number, these were named widely
>>> different in
>>> projects, (BOM, MP, MPN, #mfg, or different syntaxes in
>>> the Value field )
>>> I even saw a mix of these in the same project
>>> once, along with
>>> some people having the vendor id only.
>>> - Manufacturer ( found some different languages though
>>> )
>>>
>>> more uncommon things was, Tolerance( 10%, 20pps), Ratings
>>> ( 1/4W, 85C,
>>> 16V ), Vendor information and different Descriptions. They
>>> were named
>>> and abbreviated
>>> very differently accross projects.
>>>
>>> What I would like to see is these additional fields by
>>> default, but
>>> hidden from the schematic unless changed by user.
>>> Tolerance ( used for setting tolerances of resistors,
>>> capacitors,
>>> oscillators, etc )
>>> MaxRating ( field were one can specify max Voltage,
>>> Ampere,
>>> Frequency, or whatever the component needs )
>>> Manufacturer ( For inhouse numbers, they could either
>>> just remove
>>> it, or use the company/group name )
>>> MPN ( Maybe PartNumber could be used here, and people
>>> who use
>>> inhouse numbers use it aswell, I dont really care what its
>>> called, as
>>> long as its called something )
>>> Vendor
>>> Notes
>>>
>>> I would be all up for extra additions/removals, but I
>>> would prefer if
>>> the naming is not discussed, but rather just
>>> decided/agreed upon by
>>> someone in the lead team.
>>> The very least I think should be added in case the
>>> previous is to much are:
>>> Tolerance
>>> Manufacturer
>>> MPN
>>>
>>> I attach a patch for the minimal set, tested on linux by
>>> removing the
>>> .config/kicad/eeschema file.
>>>
>>> - Kristoffer
>>>
>>>
>>> ps
>>> Some github files i reviewed, not all:
>>> https://github.com/AnaviTechnology/anavi-gardening/blob/
>>> master/MCP3002-I_SN.lib
>>> <https://github.com/AnaviTechnology/anavi-gardening/blob/
>>> master/MCP3002-I_SN.lib>
>>> https://github.com/jonpe960/blixten/blob/master/Blixten%20L
>>> ED%20Device/Blixten.sch
>>> <https://github.com/jonpe960/blixten/blob/master/Blixten%20
>>> LED%20Device/Blixten.sch>
>>> https://github.com/paltatech/half-bridge/blob/master/pcb%20
>>> design/IGBT_board-cache.lib
>>> <https://github.com/paltatech/half-bridge/blob/
>>> master/pcb%20design/IGBT_board-cache.lib>
>>> https://github.com/pluggee/KiCADLibs/blob/master/sch/cap_sm
>>> d.lib
>>> <https://github.com/pluggee/KiCADLibs/blob/master/sch/cap_s
>>> md.lib>
>>> https://github.com/jim17/memtype/blob/master/schematic_pcb/
>>> electronic_design_kicad/electronic_design_kicad.sch
>>> <https://github.com/jim17/memtype/blob/master/schematic_pcb
>>> /electronic_design_kicad/electronic_design_kicad.sch>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Remember The Past, Live The Present, Change The Future
>>> Those who look only to the past or the present are certain to miss the
>>> future [JFK]
>>>
>>> kandrey89@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Live Long and Prosper,
>>> Andrey
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References