launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00582
Re: Free Software Project Hosting (a comparison of different options)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Karl Fogel<karl.fogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jonathan Lange <jml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> I didn't know about the expensive/useless import problem -- it's a
>> shame that a failure report wouldn't catch those. Still, I think that
>> it's still a good idea to remove the approval process, even before we
>> have a failure report web page or add svn repo heuristics. There are
>> costs, but the benefit seems worth it.
>
> +1.
>
> If a vcs import produces no useful result, we'll hear about it if anyone
> tries to use it; and if no one is trying to use it, then who cares?
>
> Also, failures that we hear about from users will motivate us (or even
> the users?) to set up the reporting system. We should consider that an
> eventual consequence of automatic approval, rather than a prerequisite.
>
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/418932
Not assigned to anyone.
jml
References