← Back to team overview

lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

Re: Font-config warning in lubuntu 12.10 i386

 

For me?

yeah the bug number! I had a reboot after major update & cannot find it!
The guy from #ubuntu+1 I was chatting to is afk, so I cannot ask him but
others may have a look.

Thanks,

Phill.

On 26 August 2012 10:10, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 8/26/12 12:07 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Hi Lars,
> >
> > can you get the info from /var/log to paste up? along with an lspci from
> > it, and a cat /proc/cpuinfo
> >
> > Please feed the #ubuntu+1 team some crumbs :) They will look into it, but
> > really do need something to go on!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Phill.
>
> Yes, I've gotten syslog, lightdm.log, Xorg.0.log, output from lspci and
> cpuinfo uploaded as attachments to the bug.  Anything else?  Dave
> Gilbert seemed to think the problem is with X and added that to the
> bug's subject.  Certainly X does not start and I cannot even forward X
> apps from the machine via SSH.
>
> Regards,
> /Lars
>
> > On 26 August 2012 09:15, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/25/12 9:16 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> >>> Lars,
> >>>
> >>> #ubuntu+1 have confirmed my initial thoughts, please try to get
> terminal
> >>> session up & ubuntu-bug ubiquity for them
> >>
> >> The apport-* series does not work, giving python errors:
> >>
> >>         ERROR: The launchpadlib Python module is not installed.
> >>         This functionality is not available.
> >>
> >> Same with ubuntu-bug if I try to associate it with an existing bug
> >> report (#1041625)
> >>         https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625
> >>
> >> I've done the update:
> >>         apt-get update && apt-get -y upgrade && apt-get -y dist-upgrade
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> /Lars
> >>
> >>> (19:06:45) phillw: anyone want more info from the tester?
> >>> (19:07:39) penguin42: phillw: The fontconfig bit is a redherring
> >>> (19:07:59) penguin42: phillw: Everything is moaning about fontconfig
> but
> >>> carrying on; so it's something separate
> >>> (19:08:40) phillw: penguin42: it appears to be stopping the
> installation?
> >>> Lars is a fairly experienced tester, what more do you need?
> >>> (19:08:58) penguin42: phillw: can he get to a text shell at that point?
> >>> (19:09:34) phillw: I'll have to email him - he is not IRC person
> >>> (19:09:47) phillw: if he can, what do you need?
> >>> (19:10:06) penguin42: phillw: If he can get to a text shell and bring
> up
> >>> networking then get him to run ubuntu-bug ubiquity and it'll post a
> load
> >> of
> >>> stuff to launchpad
> >>> (19:10:34) ActionParsnip: phillw: did you update ubiquity before
> kicking
> >> it
> >>> off?
> >>> (19:10:34) phillw: penguin42: that is what I suggested to him :)
> >>> (19:10:58) penguin42: phillw: If not it's a little difficult; I'd make
> >> more
> >>> of a guess in terms of X/graphics issues - when he says old, how
> old/what
> >>> spec?
> >>> (19:11:20) phillw: I just wanted to check if i was on the correct track
> >> to
> >>> get the data you need.
> >>> (19:13:05) phillw: it is not within the bounds of possibiliiity that it
> >> is
> >>> the PAE/ non-PAE kernel etc. But I'd have expected it to complain long
> >>> before that?
> >>> (19:15:57) penguin42: yeh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Phill.
> >>> On 25 August 2012 18:59, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Lars,
> >>>>
> >>>> off the top of my head....  issue it to Ubiquity, that is the system
> >> that
> >>>> does the installs. The devs can always re-allocate it later. Does it
> >> try to
> >>>> make a bug report? If not, then I'd suggest using the bug-report
> >> function
> >>>> to get the data off the system.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Phill.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 25 August 2012 18:39, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I've got an old i386 machine that runs 12.04 fine but with 12.10
> daily
> >>>>> (several versions) it will not finish booting.  After the text
> screen,
> >>>>> it comes up with a screenful of Fontconfig warnings. e.g.:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-nanum.conf",
> >>>>>         line 40: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and
> >>>>>         may not works as expected.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll have this machine for a few more days at least so I can do a
> >> little
> >>>>> testing with it.  What other data would be needed before I file a bug
> >>>>> report?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> /Lars
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> >>>>> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> >>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

Follow ups

References