← Back to team overview

lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

Re: zRAM has been removed from Lubuntu 13.10 daily build of 17-Jun

 

If you are trying to tell me that:

http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20130617/

is NOT the same as:

http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/current/

while BOTH ISO on BOTH links show:

"saucy-desktop-i386.iso 17-Jun-2013 17:33 687M Desktop image for PC
(Intel x86) computers (standard download)"
" saucy-desktop-i386.iso 17-Jun-2013 17:33 687M Desktop image for PC
(Intel x86) computers (standard download)"

Then, seriously, how would you guys except anyone can tell the
difference between them?

Why there are two directories anyway? "current" and "20130617" ???

Why not make life easier? why we make it harder?

Okay, I will cool down and wait for some logical explanation. I will
not do anything until everyone is happy!
So, I will wait :D


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
<amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really don't like short answers without explanation :)
>
> I did NOT use a wrong ISO. If that so, blame the website, don't blame
> the tester. I know you are not blaming, I'm just saying what happened:
>
> I have done this:
>
> 1- http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/current/
> 2- downloaded:  saucy-desktop-i386.iso 17-Jun-2013 17:33 687M Desktop
> image for PC (Intel x86) computers (standard download)
> 3- MD5SUM Checked: 61c94f7ff9905400c8bae5a3872fb2c3 *saucy-desktop-i386.iso
> 4- zsync the ISO after telling Phill about what is going on
>
> And, NO zRAM and NO Firefox!!
>
> How is that suddenly a previous ISO had both zRAM and Firefox and a
> latest one as per the website does not?
>
> I am NOT 100% sure but I guess the one I tested the other day was
> 13-June Image and if it is 13-June Image or not, I'm 100% sure it
> wasn't the latest and both zRAM and Firefox was there.
>
> There must be something wrong and obviously, it is not my mistake :D
>
> If you still thinking I'm dreaming, I'd appreciate some LOGICAL
> explanation before just closing my bugs without any good reason, IMHO
> :D
> I could be wrong though but all what I'm asking for is a simple explanation :)
>
> I had 2 very long days with tons of testing, and at the end of the
> day, I wouldn't be happy at all when someone come and tell me that I
> have picked the wrong ISO while everything refer to it is the latest
> one.
>
> IF I picked the wrong one, how is that zsync did not update it?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Nope,
>>
>> Ali mistakenlgly used an older ISO from before ZRam was added. It has been
>> resolved.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phill.
>>
>> On 18 June 2013 03:48, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/17/2013 07:16 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>>> > zram:
>>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1192005
>>> >
>>> > Browser:
>>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1192010
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
>>> > <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> O_o
>>> >>
>>> >> Firefox does not exist as well: http://i40.tinypic.com/9th4p4.jpg
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
>>> >> <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Yorvyk <yorvik.ubunto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>> Don’t know why it#s missing, but it may be worth repeating the tests
>>> >>>> you've
>>> >>>> done, if you have time, with today’s daily to see what difference it
>>> >>>> makes.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Steve
>>> >>> $ zsync
>>> >>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20130617/saucy-desktop-i386.iso.zsync
>>> >>> #################### 100.0% 129.9 kBps DONE
>>> >>>
>>> >>> reading seed file saucy-desktop-i386.iso:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************Read
>>> >>> saucy-desktop-i386.iso. Target 100.0% complete.
>>> >>> verifying download...checksum matches OK
>>> >>> used 720371712 local, fetched 0
>>> >>>
>>> >>> And, it is NOT there.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> top reports: ZERO KB SWAP.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> and http://i41.tinypic.com/a0kwgx.jpg
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It should be there by default on the LiveCD, otherwise, it is totally
>>> >>> useless to have it AFTER installing the system.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If the above statement is wrong, the whole day yesterday went for
>>> >>> vain. Why would we carry on with tests and it is not there by default?
>>> >>> absolutely no point :D
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The whole idea is to have it by default so the installation process be
>>> >>> smoother and easier without crash, etc.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If we are adding it so it will be active/enabled AFTER installing the
>>> >>> system, then, please, I would vote against that.
>>> >>> It should be there while we are on the LiveCD.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best Regards,
>>> >>> amjjawad
>>> >>> Start Ubuntu
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with
>>> >>> 489MB RAM
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
>>> >>
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> amjjawad
>>> >> Start Ubuntu
>>> >>
>>> >> Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with
>>> >> 489MB RAM
>>> >
>>> >
>>> I checked 20130617 i386 and it seems OK to me:
>>>
>>> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/142704171/firefox_zram.png
>>>
>>> I see from your bug filing that it states:
>>>
>>> "LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Alpha i386 (20130607)"
>>>
>>> Are you perhaps booting the iso using grub2 and getting the path_to_iso
>>> wrong?
>>>
>>> Lance
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
>
> --
> "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
>
> Best Regards,
> amjjawad
> Start Ubuntu
>
> Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with 489MB RAM



--
"All of us are smarter than any one of us."

Best Regards,
amjjawad
Start Ubuntu

Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with 489MB RAM


Follow ups

References