lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

["Ali Linx (amjjawad)" <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I really don't like short answers without explanation :)

I did NOT use a wrong ISO. If that so, blame the website, don't blame
the tester. I know you are not blaming, I'm just saying what happened:

I have done this:

1- http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/current/
2- downloaded:  saucy-desktop-i386.iso 17-Jun-2013 17:33 687M Desktop
image for PC (Intel x86) computers (standard download)
3- MD5SUM Checked: 61c94f7ff9905400c8bae5a3872fb2c3 *saucy-desktop-i386.iso
4- zsync the ISO after telling Phill about what is going on

And, NO zRAM and NO Firefox!!

How is that suddenly a previous ISO had both zRAM and Firefox and a
latest one as per the website does not?

I am NOT 100% sure but I guess the one I tested the other day was
13-June Image and if it is 13-June Image or not, I'm 100% sure it
wasn't the latest and both zRAM and Firefox was there.

There must be something wrong and obviously, it is not my mistake :D

If you still thinking I'm dreaming, I'd appreciate some LOGICAL
explanation before just closing my bugs without any good reason, IMHO
:D
I could be wrong though but all what I'm asking for is a simple explanation :)

I had 2 very long days with tons of testing, and at the end of the
day, I wouldn't be happy at all when someone come and tell me that I
have picked the wrong ISO while everything refer to it is the latest
one.

IF I picked the wrong one, how is that zsync did not update it?



On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nope,
>
> Ali mistakenlgly used an older ISO from before ZRam was added. It has been
> resolved.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
>
> On 18 June 2013 03:48, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 06/17/2013 07:16 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
>> > zram:
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1192005
>> >
>> > Browser:
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1192010
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
>> > <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> O_o
>> >>
>> >> Firefox does not exist as well: http://i40.tinypic.com/9th4p4.jpg
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad)
>> >> <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Yorvyk <yorvik.ubunto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> Don’t know why it#s missing, but it may be worth repeating the tests
>> >>>> you've
>> >>>> done, if you have time, with today’s daily to see what difference it
>> >>>> makes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Steve
>> >>> $ zsync
>> >>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20130617/saucy-desktop-i386.iso.zsync
>> >>> #################### 100.0% 129.9 kBps DONE
>> >>>
>> >>> reading seed file saucy-desktop-i386.iso:
>> >>>
>> >>> ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************Read
>> >>> saucy-desktop-i386.iso. Target 100.0% complete.
>> >>> verifying download...checksum matches OK
>> >>> used 720371712 local, fetched 0
>> >>>
>> >>> And, it is NOT there.
>> >>>
>> >>> top reports: ZERO KB SWAP.
>> >>>
>> >>> and http://i41.tinypic.com/a0kwgx.jpg
>> >>>
>> >>> It should be there by default on the LiveCD, otherwise, it is totally
>> >>> useless to have it AFTER installing the system.
>> >>>
>> >>> If the above statement is wrong, the whole day yesterday went for
>> >>> vain. Why would we carry on with tests and it is not there by default?
>> >>> absolutely no point :D
>> >>>
>> >>> The whole idea is to have it by default so the installation process be
>> >>> smoother and easier without crash, etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> If we are adding it so it will be active/enabled AFTER installing the
>> >>> system, then, please, I would vote against that.
>> >>> It should be there while we are on the LiveCD.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
>> >>>
>> >>> Best Regards,
>> >>> amjjawad
>> >>> Start Ubuntu
>> >>>
>> >>> Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with
>> >>> 489MB RAM
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> amjjawad
>> >> Start Ubuntu
>> >>
>> >> Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with
>> >> 489MB RAM
>> >
>> >
>> I checked 20130617 i386 and it seems OK to me:
>>
>> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/142704171/firefox_zram.png
>>
>> I see from your bug filing that it states:
>>
>> "LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Alpha i386 (20130607)"
>>
>> Are you perhaps booting the iso using grub2 and getting the path_to_iso
>> wrong?
>>
>> Lance
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw



--
"All of us are smarter than any one of us."

Best Regards,
amjjawad
Start Ubuntu

Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with 489MB RAM